Verity
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (LIVE) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (LIVE) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #12 52 Skip R 52 47/13/38 | #13 35 Skip R 16 14/34/50 | #11 31 Skip R 6 4/43/51 | #12 36 Skip R 18 10/50/38 | #12 36 Skip R 18 7/60/31 | #12 36 Skip R 18 8/57/33 | #12 37 Skip R 19 7/65/26 | #12 36 Skip R 18 9/53/36 | #12 35 Skip R 15 9/45/44 | #12 38 Skip R 21 11/53/34 | #13 33 Skip R 11 6/49/43 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 Ruining your marriage and dying because you didn’t tell your husband it was opposite day VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.25 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.47 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokes about plot events without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke summarizing plot twist; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking summary of the plot with no explicit judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke summarizing the plot without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about the plot, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about the plot, with no clear judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about plot events and a 'opposite day' gag; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about the plot and does not express a verdict on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #1 w 0.707 "Let me explain" could've easily be "It was fake!" or "it was a writing exercise!". VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.315 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Suggests alternative character dialogue without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses an alternate line of dialogue without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Speculates about plot/dialogue alternatives without expressing any judgement of the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses character dialogue and plot mechanics without expressing an opinion on the film's overall quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot alternative about the explanation, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Suggests possible explanations for the ending without expressing an opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment quotes the film's dialogue and riffs on a possible twist without expressing whether they liked the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing the plot and potential endings without expressing a clear judgment on the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #2 w 0.577 If he didn't pause to let her explain, I don't think he would have paused after either of those. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.33 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a character’s likely actions without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character's behavior in the plot without judging the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment speculates about a character's actions in the plot without giving any judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot/character discussion with no opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about character choices, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a character's actions without expressing an opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot-level discussion of a character's actions; no judgement of the film's quality or whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion and speculation without expressing a judgement on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #3 w 0.5 Not to mention, she also could have at least tried to speak to him about it anytime between: Him initially discovering the writing on the computer The moment she later realized that he thought it was real. Like why would you just let your husband think that and not clarify?… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.69 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.53 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes a character’s choices and theorizes about the manuscript, without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Critiques a character's choices and offers a plot theory; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and character choices and offers a theory about the note and manuscript; the 'stupid' criticism targets a character, not the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment engages in plot and character analysis and shares an in-universe theory without judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about character choices and manuscript truth, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the character’s actions and speculates about the plot, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.69 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the plot and character actions as 'fucking stupid'. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − |
| thread #4 w 0.447 I dont get it. If Verity was waiting for her chance to escape and was afraid of her husband, why didn't see reveal herself to Lowen when it was just them in the house alone. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.178 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions a character's actions and plot logic without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot confusion question about Verity's motives; no explicit judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter questions a plot point about Verity's behavior; it's a confusion about the story, not a judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks a question about character logic and plot details without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot logic question only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a character's motivation and plot logic without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about a character's motivation; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a plot point and asking a question about the narrative without judging the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #5 w 0.408 First thing I said to my wife when we got out of the movie. Second was why did Lowen giving him a manuscript he'd already seen make him all of a sudden believe she wasn't incapacitated. Third was when did Lowen become someone that encourages murder. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.251 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.54 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Questions implausible plot developments and inconsistent characterization, indicating dissatisfaction with the film's writing. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Raises plot-logic and character-consistency complaints after leaving the theater, implying criticism of the film's writing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter raises plot-logic and character-consistency complaints about the film's writing, implying dissatisfaction, though no explicit overall verdict is given. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter points out multiple logical flaws, plot holes, and character inconsistencies right after leaving the theater. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes plot logic and character inconsistency after leaving the theater. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s plot logic and Lowen’s characterization, suggesting the movie didn’t work for them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.251 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter highlights major plot holes and absurdities, indicating dissatisfaction with the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #6 w 0.378 "why did Lowen giving him a manuscript he'd already seen make him all of a sudden believe she wasn't incapacitated" - My take is that he saw this an another opportunity to kill her with justification from Lowen this time. So he acted shocked as a performance for Lowen because… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.618 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.21 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Offers a theory about a character's motives and actions without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation of a character's motives; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Pure plot interpretation answering a question about a character's motivation; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion and character motivation theory with no opinion expressed on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about character motives; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers a plot interpretation without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers a plot theory about a character's motives; no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing plot theories and character motivations without expressing a personal verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #7 w 0.354 In the book, he doesn’t act shocked. He’s more neutral and immediately asks “where did you get this?” VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.318 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a character’s reaction in the book without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares a character's reaction in the book; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Compares a character's behavior in the book to the film without giving any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Factual comparison to the book with no judgment expressed about the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares a scene to the book; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares a character’s reaction in the book without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the film's scene to the book's version without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses book and movie plot differences without judging the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #8 w 0.333 We are supposed to feel that Lowen is transforming into Verity and that includes the capacity for homicide. I do not believe the movie actually pulled this off, though. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — They criticize the film for failing to convincingly portray Lowen’s transformation into Verity. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Commenter says the movie failed to pull off its intended character transformation, a criticism of execution. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes the film for failing to convincingly pull off Lowen's transformation into Verity, a central element. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the movie's execution, stating it failed to convincingly pull off a central character transformation. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for failing to pull off Lowen's transformation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the movie failed to convincingly portray Lowen transforming into Verity. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.0 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states the movie failed to successfully execute the character transformation. | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #9 w 0.316 In the book, no. The manuscript is so much more fucked up that it makes a little sense why Lowen would think she deserves to die. In the movie, I didn’t feel the same motive. I was disgusted reading the book. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.922 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the movie for failing to establish Lowen’s motive as convincingly as the book. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares book and movie on Lowen's motive; notes a difference but gives no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film for failing to convey the motive as effectively as the book; disgust refers to the book's content, but film comparison is unfavorable. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the movie for failing to effectively convey the character's motive compared to the book. Grok 4.7: negative — Movie failed to convey the motive that worked in the book. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the movie for not conveying the same motive as the book. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.922 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter dislikes the movie's adaptation because it failed to convey the character's motive effectively compared to the book. | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #10 w 0.302 yeah they sanitized it so bad. I was disappointed that they completely skipped over the wire hanger abortion attempt, like they didn’t even ALLUDE to it! VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.635 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Expresses disappointment that the adaptation sanitized the material and omitted a significant disturbing scene. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Commenter criticises the adaptation as sanitized and says they were disappointed by omitted content. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says the film sanitized the source material and states disappointment that it skipped a key scene, which is criticism of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film for being overly sanitized and expresses disappointment over omitted book scenes. Grok 4.7: negative — Disappointed the film sanitized and omitted dark book content. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the film was sanitized and explicitly express disappointment about a major omission. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.635 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Disappointed by the sanitization and omission of a major plot point from the book. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #11 w 0.289 because colleen hoover is a very bad writer lol like how do you lead up to such a big thing and not cover obvious plot holes 😀 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.506 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes Colleen Hoover’s writing and plot holes without clearly judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Blames the author's bad writing for obvious plot holes in the story, implying criticism of the film's plot. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the writing and unaddressed plot holes in the story, implying a negative judgment of the film's source material and plot. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes the book author's writing and plot holes, without directly judging the movie adaptation itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Criticizes the author and plot holes, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the story’s buildup and plot holes, expressing dissatisfaction with the film’s writing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter calls the author a very bad writer and points out obvious plot holes, a clear criticism of the story. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the author a very bad writer and criticizes unresolved plot holes. | + | − | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #12 w 0.277 Colleen Hoover believed the manuscript, not the letter, which was to manipulate Lowen after Verity saw Lowen get Jeremy. According to that view it's not a plot hole VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Explains a plot interpretation and addresses an alleged plot hole without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses author's intent and plot interpretation without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot interpretation and author's intent regarding a plot hole, without judging whether the film is good or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses plot points and the author's perspective without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory defending a plot hole, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an interpretation of the plot and whether it creates a plot hole, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot interpretation and author intent about manuscript versus letter; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot theories without expressing a personal judgment or verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #13 w 0.267 Why is she casually leaving story exercises about murdering her daughter around the house for her husband or anyone else to read? If she could move and talk the whole time why not just explain the situation to Lowen when you get the chance? Or your nurse, who is conveniently… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.484 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes implausible character decisions and the nurse’s convenient absences as contrived storytelling. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Points out plot holes and contrived writing, like the conveniently absent nurse, which criticises the film's logic. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — The commenter points out plot holes and implausible character choices, which criticizes the film's writing rather than just discussing the plot. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the plot holes and contrived writing conveniences of the story. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes plot holes and convenient, illogical character behavior. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The commenter questions implausible character decisions and contrivances, criticizing the film’s story. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter poses plot-logic objections, mocking the film's contrivances ('conveniently always gone'), implying dissatisfaction with its writing without praising it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes plot holes and character actions, indicating dissatisfaction with the film. | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #14 w 0.258 It’s dumb but as she says, he didn’t like to read her work. Sucks that the one time he does is when she’s writing fiction about their lives like it’s real. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a character’s actions and plot circumstances without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot irony about the husband reading her manuscript; 'dumb' refers to the situation, not the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses a plot point about the characters; 'dumb' refers to a character's behavior, not a clear judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses character motivations and plot details without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot commentary on characters' actions, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling it dumb criticizes the film, and the comment frames the situation as frustrating. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film 'dumb' and focuses on a critical plot point; the verdict on the film is negative. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Calls the movie "dumb" and expresses dissatisfaction. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #15 w 0.25 why didnt she leave when they were out on a date for the birthday 😂 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.654 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions a character's decision without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking plot question about a character's choice; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot question/joke about a character's choice; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment questions a character's actions in the plot without giving a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot question about a character choice, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a character's plot decision without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about a character's choice; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is asking a plot question about character behavior without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 Ending it on the Hot Ones clip was certainly a choice VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.34 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.33 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — The sarcastic phrasing signals disapproval of the film’s ending choice. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Wry remark about the ending's Hot Ones clip; no clear overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment notes an odd stylistic choice about the ending without clearly praising or criticizing the film; ambiguous and non-evaluative overall. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about an ending clip without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Sarcastic jab implies disapproval of the film's ending choice. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling the ending choice unusual implies disapproval of the film’s ending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Snarky remark about a Hot Ones clip used as the ending; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only mentions a specific scene without expressing a clear like or dislike for the film. | + | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #17 w 0.236 and the Call Her Daddy clip(s) VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.41 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Mentions Call Her Daddy clips without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Fragmentary reference to Call Her Daddy clips; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Brief reference to Call Her Daddy clips, likely marketing or promotion, with no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Mentions podcast clips without expressing any opinion or verdict on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Fragment about podcast clips, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions clips without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only a reference to a Call Her Daddy clip; no judgement of the film expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Mentioning a promotional clip without judging the film itself. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #18 w 0.229 I laughed out loud when the Hot Ones clip showed up, next few minutes were awkward because I was the only one who reacted that way. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.34 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.37 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes laughing at a clip and an awkward audience reaction without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about laughing at a Hot Ones clip; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes laughing at a Hot Ones clip and an awkward moment in the theater; no overall judgment of the film is given. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes an anecdote about laughing at a specific scene in the theater without judging the film overall. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Anecdote about laughing at one clip, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes laughing at one clip and feeling awkward, without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions a Hot Ones clip and a personal reaction; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is sharing a personal viewing experience and a joke without evaluating the quality of the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #19 w 0.224 It should've shown her tearing up from superhot wings too lol, not sure why they pick Hot Ones just to show her talking normally. It could've been made up podcast/interview or going to big TV shows Jimmy Fallon. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.211 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the Hot Ones scene as an unnecessary choice that should have been handled differently. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Jokey nitpick about a Hot Ones cameo scene choice; no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment critiques a specific marketing/promo choice (Hot Ones interview) rather than giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Nitpicks a minor detail about a talk show appearance without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Jokey nitpick of one scene choice, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s choice to use Hot Ones without showing the wings affecting her. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter critiques a scene choice (Hot Ones segment) in a promo or film context without giving an overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the realism and execution of a scene, indicating dissatisfaction with the film. | + | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − |
| thread #20 w 0.218 What happened to the nurse? I feel like she was such a key element with the ending that they realized if she were around, the ending can't make sense no matter what. Either the nurse was in on it with Verity and she would tell the police the whole plot and that she had to have… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.959 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the ending’s logic, arguing the missing nurse and implausible death circumstances create major plot holes. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Argues the ending doesn't make sense, listing plot holes about the nurse and body discovery. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot holes and ending logic as questions/analysis, without clearly stating whether they liked or recommend the film overall. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the ending's logic and points out major plot holes regarding the nurse and the body. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the ending as illogical and full of plot holes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the ending as implausible, arguing the nurse and body’s discovery would create problems for the plot. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Questions and critiques plot logic of the ending without explicitly judging whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses plot holes and logic without giving a verdict on the film. | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #21 w 0.213 The body disposal was when I about gave up the willing suspension of disbelief. Like come on. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the body disposal scene as implausible enough to undermine suspension of disbelief. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the body disposal scene as implausible, saying it nearly broke their suspension of disbelief. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says the body disposal scene nearly broke their suspension of disbelief, a criticism of the film's plausibility. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the implausibility of a scene, stating it broke their suspension of disbelief. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for an implausible body-disposal scene that broke disbelief. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize a scene as implausible and say it nearly made them give up on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — The commenter says a scene nearly broke their suspension of disbelief, a mild criticism of the film's plausibility with no offsetting praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses frustration with a plot point that ruined their immersion, indicating dissatisfaction with the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #22 w 0.209 why would you Fake a murder for someone who is catatonic and then Immediately follow that with a scene of dumping her in the lake? Like... just... put her back where you found her, and say she passed in her sleep ? Neither is believable, but the fact that she suddenly got out… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.746 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.58 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the film’s plot logic and implausible portrayal of recovery from a catatonic state. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes plot logic as unbelievable, implying the film's storytelling failed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the plot as unbelievable and illogical, pointing to the catatonic character suddenly walking to the lake, which signals a negative verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the plot logic and explicitly calls the events unbelievable. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film's plot as unbelievable and illogical. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film's scene as unbelievable and question its logic. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.746 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes implausible plot points and illogical character actions in the film. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − |
| thread #23 w 0.204 I threw my arms up when the we’re dumping her in the lake because it made no sense. That son is going to need so much therapy some day and possibly needs to report both his parents for murder. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.848 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the lake disposal scene as making no sense, indicating dissatisfaction with the film's plotting. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Frustration at the characters' lake decision and commentary on the son; no clear overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes a plot point as making no sense (threw arms up), though the rest is plot commentary; overall leans critical. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes a plot point for making no sense, expressing frustration. Grok 4.7: negative — Frustrated that a key plot decision made no sense. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize a plot decision as making no sense, indicating dissatisfaction with the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — The commenter criticises the film's plot as nonsensical ('made no sense'), a clear negative judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the plot holes and nonsensical nature of the film's climax. | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #24 w 0.2 The thing is no one knew she was catatonic except a select few people. To the world she was just Verity, hence the cop asking asking if they were working on her book together. It makes sense. Her daughter died there, so just looks like a grieving mother’s suicide. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.896 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Explains plot logic and character circumstances without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains plot logic about Verity's condition and perceived suicide; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion explaining story logic about Verity's catatonic state; no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is pure plot discussion explaining why an event in the story makes sense, without evaluating the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Explains a plot point; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Explains the plot and a character’s circumstances without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot explanation about the story's logic; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing plot details and making sense of the story without expressing a verdict on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #25 w 0.196 Only if the cops don't talk to the nurse or verify the medical records VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.46 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses plot plausibility involving police investigation without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion about police investigation logic; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot speculation about police investigation and medical records; no judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses plot points without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot hole quip only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about what the cops might verify; gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A plot-logic remark about police and medical records; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the plot logic of the film as implausible. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #26 w 0.192 Then, magically, the two of them are together. No possible motive there.... VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Sarcastically discusses characters’ relationship and possible motive without clearly judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Sarcastic remark about the characters' suspicious motives; it's plot commentary, not a judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Sarcastic plot observation about characters' motives; no explicit judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses character motives and plot points without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Sarcastically criticizes an unmotivated plot pairing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Sarcastically criticizes the film’s implausible character pairing and lack of motive. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Points out a plot inconsistency about a character pairing; no clear judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Sarcastic criticism of the plot progression implies a negative view of the film. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #27 w 0.189 Well in the book they don’t throw her in the lake lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.599 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.13 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Compares a plot detail with the book without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares a plot detail with the book and offers no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only notes a plot difference from the book, without judging the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely points out a plot difference from the book without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes a book-vs-film plot difference, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the film with the book but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment compares a plot detail to the book with a joke; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a plot difference from the book without judging the film. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 Small town cops doing everything they possibly can to convince themselves a clear murder is an accident is actually the most realistic part of this movie lol VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.34 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.74 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokes about the realism of the cops’ behavior without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about realistic small-town cops; the light jab at realism gives no clear like or dislike. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about a plot point's realism; no overall judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a plot point without stating whether they liked or disliked the overall movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about plot realism, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the realism of one plot element without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot element's realism without giving any overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the realism of the plot point, implying a negative view of the film's quality. | − | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #29 w 0.183 Also, there would have been clear bruising her her neck even if he let go. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.382 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.53 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses physical consequences of a plot event without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot logic observation about bruising; no overall judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot detail observation about bruising on a neck; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a minor plot detail and realism without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot-detail nitpick about bruising; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Points out a likely plot or realism issue without judging whether the film is good. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment makes a factual point about a plot detail (bruising on neck) without any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a plot detail without expressing a judgment on the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #30 w 0.18 Not to mention they would see she died of asphyxiation. While not always foul play, it would definitely look suspicious. Especially with hubby immediately hooking up with and impregnating the live in hot ghost writer. Just a little suspicious right? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.838 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.31 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses suspicious plot circumstances and cause of death without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot logic about suspicious death; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and suspicious circumstances in the story without giving any judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses in-universe plot details and character actions without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about a suspicious death; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses suspicious circumstances in the plot without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot speculation about how the death would look to police; no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot logic and makes a joke without judging the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #31 w 0.177 Bruh when verity suddenly 'woke up' in front of jeremy everyone at my theatre flinched 💀💀💀💀 no amount of book reading could have prepped me for that VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.71 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a startling scene and audience reaction without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastically describes an effective scare that hit harder than the book, implying the film delivered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastically describes the theater's strong reaction to a scary scene; the shock reads as praise for the film's effect, though no explicit recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses enthusiastic engagement with an effective, shocking scene that successfully startled the audience. Grok 4.7: positive — Shocked theater reaction praises the film's effective scare, not a criticism. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the audience's reaction to a scene without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enjoyed the shocking twist, laughing with emojis and praising how unprepared they were; no criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the impactful and shocking theater experience of a specific scene. | − | − | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #32 w 0.174 that was the best part of the movie. I read the book before and even I gasped when it happened VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.637 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the movie’s best moment and its surprising impact even after reading the book. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls a scene the best part and says it made them gasp despite knowing the book; enjoyment implied. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls a scene 'the best part of the movie' and says it made even a book reader gasp, signaling enjoyment. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific moment as the best part of the movie, noting it effectively surprised them. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a scene the best part and gasped at it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it the best part of the movie and says it still made them gasp. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says a scene was the best part of the movie and that it surprised them, a clear praise verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a specific part as the best part of the movie and expresses genuine surprise. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #33 w 0.171 Josh Hartnett's reaction was amazing. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.586 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.58 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises Josh Hartnett's reaction in the film as amazing. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises an actor's performance in the film as amazing; clear positive appreciation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises one actor's reaction in a scene, but gives no overall verdict on the film or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a specific actor's performance in the film as 'amazing'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Josh Hartnett's reaction as amazing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Josh Hartnett’s performance, indicating a positive reaction to the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises Josh Hartnett's reaction as amazing, a clear compliment on the film's performance. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Praise of a single actor's performance without a clear overall judgement of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #34 w 0.169 He did amazing in this movie VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.586 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises an actor’s performance in the film, expressing a positive judgment. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises an actor's performance in the film, implying a favorable view of the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises an actor's performance in the film as amazing, implying a favorable view of the movie. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter directly praises an actor's performance in the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a performance in this movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises a performance in the movie, expressing approval of it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the actor's performance in the film, calling it amazing. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the performance indicates a positive view of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #35 w 0.167 That was actually very well done, entirely down to Hathaway and Hartnett I think. I knew it was coming (also read the book) but it still felt chilling. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.14 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film very well done and praises the performances and chilling impact despite knowing the story. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it very well done, praises Hathaway and Hartnett, and says it felt chilling despite knowing the twist. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film 'very well done', credits the leads' performances, and says it still felt chilling, which is praise. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the execution and acting, calling it 'very well done' and 'chilling'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film very well done and chilling despite knowing the plot. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it very well done and says it still felt chilling despite knowing what was coming. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the performances as very well done and says it felt chilling, a clear favorable verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as well done and chilling, crediting the lead actors. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #36 w 0.164 a girl screamed so loud in our theater that whole room erupted laughing - it was nice levity haha VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.84 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes an amusing audience reaction without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a funny audience moment in the theater without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about a theater moment and audience reaction; no explicit judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only describes an anecdote about the theater audience's reaction without judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Theater anecdote about audience laughter, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a theater reaction and finding it funny, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a theater incident and laughter but gives no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter describes a funny theater experience without expressing a verdict on the film itself. | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #37 w 0.162 "You'll never see Crew or I again." *Crew or me You wouldn't say, "You'll never see I again." VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Corrects a grammatical error in dialogue without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Grammar correction of a quoted line; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only corrects the grammar of a line of dialogue; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only corrects the grammar of a quote and offers no opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Grammar nitpick on a quote, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Corrects the grammar of a quoted line without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a grammar correction of a quoted line, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Grammar correction of a quote, no verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #38 w 0.16 I don't know how that made past so many stages of production and no one corrected it! It's even more embarrassing as the character that wrote the letter is an author! VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.689 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes an uncorrected production oversight as embarrassing, especially given the letter writer is an author. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticises an embarrassing uncorrected error in the film, a clear complaint about its production quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film for an embarrassing error that slipped through production, implying poor quality control; no praise offered. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes a specific prop or production error without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes an embarrassing uncorrected production error in the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize an apparent error that made it through production, calling it embarrassing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticizes a continuity/writing error as embarrassing, implying the film's quality was lacking; no overall praise offered. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes production flaws and calls it embarrassing, indicating dislike. | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #39 w 0.158 Yeah, but it’s Coleen Hoover… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.153 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Dismisses the author without expressing a judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Dismissive remark about author Colleen Hoover, with no explicit judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Dismissive jab at the author's reputation implies low expectations or disdain, though it doesn't directly assess the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses skepticism about the book's author rather than judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Mentions the author only, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The dismissive reference to the author implies skepticism about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — The dismissive 'Yeah, but it's Coleen Hoover' implies disdain for the film's source and quality, a negative judgement without explicit praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Dismissive remark implying the author's work is poor quality. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #40 w 0.156 this is just a forever argument with so many incorrect people. thank you. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.72 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The comment references an argument and thanks someone without expressing a judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment refers to an ongoing debate and thanks someone; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about an online debate and thanks someone; it gives no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses agreement with another user about an ongoing argument, offering no opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Thanks someone amid an argument; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They refer to an ongoing argument, not whether they liked or recommend the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment complains about an argument among commenters, not expressing a judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an argument without expressing a clear verdict on the film. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #41 w 0.154 One of the laziest twists I've seen. The movie simply presents the twist without attempting to sell it. It's just...there, with the convenient excuse that "we don't know which one is the truth anyway." The Housemaid was dumb fun. This one was just dumb. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.66 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the lazy, unconvincing twist and dismisses the film as dumb rather than entertaining. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls the twist lazy and unsold, and the film 'just dumb' compared to The Housemaid. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls the twist one of the laziest, says the movie fails to sell it, and concludes 'this one was just dumb.' Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the movie's lazy twist and explicitly calls the film 'just dumb'. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the twist lazy and the movie just dumb. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls the twist lazy and the movie dumb, expressing clear dissatisfaction. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the twist lazy and the film 'just dumb,' with only a passing nod to 'dumb fun' in a different film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the lazy twist and calls the movie 'just dumb'. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #42 w 0.152 That’s how it was in the book. It was done equally terribly there as well. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.361 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Says the film handled it terribly, just as the book did. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Saying it was done 'equally terribly' in the book implies the film handled it terribly too. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says something in the film was done 'equally terribly' as in the book, criticizing the execution, though aimed at a specific element. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter states the element was done "equally terribly" in both the book and the movie. Grok 4.7: negative — Says the film handled it equally terribly as the book. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the film handled something terribly, just as the book did. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says the film's handling of the material was 'equally terrible' as the book, a clear criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the portrayal 'terribly' done, matching the book. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #44 w 0.149 In the scene where Verity and Jeremy meet, why does the bartender immediately agree to stop serving her drinks just because Jeremy asks? Was it Jeremy’s party? It didn’t seem like it. Since when does a random guy get to decide whether another customer gets served? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.722 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions a scene’s logic without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Questions plot logic of one scene without giving an overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a question about a plot detail (bartender's behavior in a scene) without giving an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks a question about a specific scene's logic without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Questions a scene's logic without judging the film overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Questions a scene’s plausibility but gives no opinion on the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about a bartender scene; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking a plot question about a scene without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 50 Shades of Grey-esque moment, geniunely thought it was alluding to him being someone powerful VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.28 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Compares a moment to another film and discusses character expectations without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a scene's resemblance and their interpretation, without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a moment resembling 50 Shades and the commenter's misreading of a character; no overall judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a comparison and discusses a plot interpretation without expressing a verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot observation and theory only; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on an interpretation of a scene without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a plot-related remark comparing a scene to 50 Shades; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a plot parallel and theory without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 In the book Verity confronted the bartender about it, that he should listen to her and not a random man, because she wanted another drink. Bartender then said he didn’t wanna be involved and directed them to another bar. At that bar, Verity ordered water after Jeremy said he… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.44 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the film's shortened adaptation of a scene as nonsensical and says it should have been replaced. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's adaptation choice: the scene was cut short and didn't make sense. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's adaptation for cutting a scene short so it didn't make sense, suggesting it should have been replaced. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes a specific scene adaptation for cutting material and not making sense. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film’s shortened scene as nonsensical and poorly adapted. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the movie’s shortened scene as confusing and say it should have been replaced. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticizes the movie's cut scene as not making sense and suggests it should have been replaced entirely. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes a scene cut in the film that made it not make sense. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #47 w 0.144 Not saying you witnessed an accident is crazy lmao that meeting should’ve been rescheduled VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.153 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.48 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Comments on characters’ actions and a plot situation without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about a character's behavior in the plot; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a character's behavior in a plot scene (not reporting an accident); gives no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment reacts to a character's actions in the plot without giving an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joking about a plot moment, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a character’s decision and the meeting timing, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot point and a character's choice, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific plot point without giving a verdict on the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #48 w 0.143 Why did she put the WHITE shirt on whilst she was still covered in blood too? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions a character's clothing choice without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A question about a scene detail with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A question about a plot detail (the white shirt and blood) with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment questions a character's action in the plot without giving a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot question about a scene choice, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a character's action in a scene without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about a costume detail; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is asking a plot question about a specific scene without expressing an opinion on the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #49 w 0.141 That whole situation pissed me off, it’s not like you overslept, you just saw someone get killed and crushed in front of you spraying you with blood?? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.858 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.79 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses frustration about a plot situation, not a judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reacts to a character's behavior in a scene without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter is angry at a character's situation or reaction to a violent scene, not judging the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter reacts to a character's situation in the plot without giving a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Frustrated by a plot situation, not judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They’re frustrated with a situation in the story, but don’t judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter is reacting to a plot situation (character witnessing a death) with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a plot point and expressing frustration with a character's situation, not the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #50 w 0.14 All of that was left in because it matches dakota’s resting bored face and acting / inability to be phased from a man dying in front of her. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.586 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.77 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes Dakota's acting as bored and unresponsive, indicating dissatisfaction with the film's performance. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mocks Dakota's acting as bored and unreactive, which criticises the film's lead performance. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Mocks Dakota's flat, bored acting as the explanation for what was left in, which reads as criticism of the performance. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the lead actress's performance, calling her expression bored and her acting unphased. Grok 4.7: negative — Mocks Dakota’s bored, unfazed acting as a film flaw. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Criticizes Dakota’s acting as bored and emotionally unconvincing during a death scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on an actor's facial expression and acting in a scene; no clear judgement of the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the acting performance in the film. | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #51 w 0.139 I laughed so hard when she said in the restaurant she has a resting bored face. Would have been even better if she then looked into the camera and winked VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.447 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.49 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — They enjoyed the restaurant joke, saying it made them laugh hard. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Jokey reaction to one line, possibly mocking; no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed a scene enough to laugh hard and suggests ways to make it even better, implying they liked the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter jokes about a specific line/scene without offering an overall judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused by one line; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Jokes about a specific scene and its hypothetical delivery, without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about a single scene's delivery; no clear judgement of the film's overall quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter makes a joke about a specific scene without giving an overall judgment of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #52 w 0.137 Why did Verity's nurse act like Lowen was another caretaker? At 2 points on the film she tells Loren she's leaving and gives her an update on Verity's current condition, and in both cases Lowen seems confused as to why she's being told this. I thought it was going to be… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.867 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.16 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions plot logic and asks for book explanations without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks plot questions and points out possible holes, but gives no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks plot questions about unexplained details and the book; points out holes but doesn't give an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks plot questions and points out logical inconsistencies without stating an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot questions and book comparison; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize unexplained plot points and implausibility in the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks plot questions and theories about inconsistencies, without stating whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter asks plot questions and discusses book differences without giving a verdict on the film. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #53 w 0.136 That caretaker was so hilarious , lol Twice she just gives this bland update to Lowen and Lowen goes "okay??" And there's no payoff, haha VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.629 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=0.97 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Amused commentary about the caretaker’s interactions, without a clear judgment of the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Amused observation about the caretaker character; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments humorously on a caretaker's scenes; no clear judgment of the film's overall quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter jokes about a funny character moment without giving an overall opinion or verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused scene observation; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the repeated scene as having no payoff, suggesting the humor doesn’t work for them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a comedic moment and a plot detail without expressing an overall judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a specific funny scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #54 w 0.135 >when they could’ve just claimed the braindead woman stopped breathing overnight That’s what the book did. Idk why they added the drowning. Maybe their idea of poetic justice? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a plot change from the book and speculates about its purpose without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares plot change to the book and speculates why; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot difference between book and film and speculates about motive; no clear judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a plot change from the book without expressing an overall opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares a plot change to the book without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They question a plot change and speculate about its purpose, but give no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the film's plot choice to the book's ending and questions a creative decision; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot differences between the book and film adaptation without expressing a personal judgment. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #56 w 0.132 Dialogue is in this was hilarious Lowen : "Is that a field ?" Jeremy: "No, it's a lake." Jeremy: "My daughter drowned in a lake last week" Lowen: "No way! My mother died of cancer last week" VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.888 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.40 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Mocks the film’s dialogue as unintentionally hilarious, highlighting awkward exposition and absurd exchanges. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mocks the film's dialogue as unintentionally hilarious and awkward, which criticizes the writing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the dialogue was hilarious and quotes it approvingly, implying enjoyment of the film, though possibly unintentional humor. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter mocks the clunky, awkward dialogue in a serious scene. Grok 4.7: negative — Mocks the film's dialogue as absurd and unintentionally hilarious. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly call the film’s dialogue hilarious. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Calls the dialogue hilarious, which leans positive, but the joke is at the film's expense, suggesting unintentional comedy rather than genuine praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Mocking the dialogue as hilarious implies the writing is bad, leading to a negative verdict. | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | + | − | − | + | 0 | − |
| thread #57 w 0.131 Haven’t seen it brought up, but did no one else think her relationship with her agent was weird? I got the impression they were casually sleeping around, before her “you should focus on Becca”. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.153 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.54 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a character relationship and its implications without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character relationship detail without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter raises an observation about a plot detail (agent relationship) without giving any overall judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a character relationship and plot detail without expressing any opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot question about a character relationship; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an interpretation of the characters’ relationship without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail about the characters' relationship with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a plot point and asking a question about character relationships without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #58 w 0.13 They were sleeping together before he met Becca in the book, yes. He seemed even weirder though because his acting was pretty terrible. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.318 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticises the film's acting as pretty terrible, with no balancing praise. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Beyond book plot discussion, criticizes an actor's performance as pretty terrible, with no counterbalancing praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Mostly book-plot clarification, but criticizes the actor's performance as 'pretty terrible' in the film, indicating a negative lean. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the acting in the film as 'pretty terrible' with no positive remarks. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the actor's performance pretty terrible. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the acting as pretty terrible, expressing a negative view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the lead actor's acting was pretty terrible, a clear criticism of the film's performance. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the acting as pretty terrible, indicating a negative view of the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #59 w 0.129 sooo bad. Also I couldn’t even hear half his lines, like please enunciate dude.. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.077 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Calls the film bad and criticizes the actor's unclear delivery. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls the film 'sooo bad' and complains about an actor's inaudible line delivery. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says the film is 'sooo bad' and complains about unintelligible dialogue, a clear criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states the movie is 'sooo bad' and criticizes an actor's line delivery. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film so bad and criticizes unclear dialogue. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls the movie bad and criticizes the inaudible dialogue. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film 'sooo bad' and complains about unclear dialogue, a clear overall criticism. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the movie 'sooo bad' and criticizes the audio/acting. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #60 w 0.128 Wow so an adult can write a story where the big reveal is "IT WAS OPPOSITE DAY". our movie opens up saying "There's a lot of superlatives that describe you..." Only to then list a bunch of adjectives that are distinctly not superlatives?!?! Why the hell was it suddenly daylight… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.517 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Calls the film boring, nonsensical, and without redeeming qualities; rates it 2/10. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Harsh criticism of writing, plot, and sound; calls it boring, nothing redeemable, rates it 2/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Harshly criticizes plot, writing, sound design and pacing, calls it boring nonsense with nothing redeemable, and gives it 2/10. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter calls the film boring, borderline nonsense, unredeemable, and gives it a 2/10. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film boring nonsense with no redeemable qualities and rates it 2/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They call the film irredeemable and boring, criticize its story and filmmaking, and rate it 2/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Mocks plot, writing, and sound design, calls it boring and unredeemable, rates it 2/10. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter heavily criticizes multiple aspects of the film and concludes it has no redeemable qualities, giving it a 2/10. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #61 w 0.127 The movie is honestly so unintentionally funny. Line deliveries, dialogue, the way people react. The way the caretaker announces her departure to Dakota directly who then looks at her like she's on 'The Office'. How Dakota talks to her lawyer friend about his love life like… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.986 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Mocks awkward acting, dialogue, and reactions; the camp-classic prediction reflects unintended comedy rather than praise of the filmmaking. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Mocks the awkward dialogue and acting as unintentionally funny, yet clearly enjoys it as a future camp classic. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Enjoys the film as unintentional camp and calls bits favorites, but frames the awkward dialogue and delivery as flaws; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Criticizes the awkward acting and dialogue, but clearly enjoyed it as an unintentionally funny 'camp classic'. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoys the film as unintentional camp and predicts cult status. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoy its awkward, unintentionally funny moments and predict it will become a camp classic. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.986 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Mocks the movie's poor acting and dialogue, calling it unintentionally funny and awkward. | + | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | − |
| thread #62 w 0.126 me and the person sitting beside me (a complete stranger btw) legit laugh out loud when Lowen suddenly gave Jeremy advise on how to strangle Verity to cover tracks.🤣🤦♂️ VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.778 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.51 P(pos)=0.95 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes laughing at a specific scene without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes laughing at a scene; unclear if laughter is enjoyment or mockery, no clear judgement of film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Laughing out loud at a scene meant to be serious implies unintentional comedy, mocking the film's writing, though no explicit overall verdict is given. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a funny reaction to a specific scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Recounts laughing at one absurd scene; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe laughing at a scene but don’t state whether they liked or recommend the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a laugh-out-loud moment and a plot beat but gives no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is sharing a funny theater moment without expressing an overall judgment of the film. | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #63 w 0.125 I laughed out loud when Verity said the babies sleep all night because they were exhausted from crying all day from being ignored. Idk but I was like damn thats funny. And then theater was silent I felt kinda bad for laughing. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.127 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.13 P(pos)=0.23 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes laughing at a disturbing line and the audience reaction, without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a personal reaction to a darkly funny line without judging the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes laughing at a dark joke in a scene, but gives no overall judgment of the film or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter shares an anecdote about laughing at a dark line in the theater without judging the film overall. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused by one line; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe laughing at a scene and the theater’s reaction, but give no judgment of the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a laugh at a specific line and the theater's reaction; no clear judgement of the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter shares a funny anecdote about their theater experience without judging the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #64 w 0.124 How Dakota talks to her lawyer friend about his love life like they've never talked before. Incredibly awkward. I didnt like the movie but he was her publisher, not lawyer and it was pretyy apparent that they had been casually hooking up but now she said he should try to get… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.787 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Explicitly says they didn't like the movie and describes dialogue as incredibly awkward. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Commenter explicitly states they didn't like the movie while clarifying a plot detail. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter explicitly states they didn't like the movie, while the rest is plot clarification and scene discussion. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states 'I didnt like the movie' while correcting a plot point from a quote. Grok 4.7: negative — Explicitly says they did not like the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The commenter explicitly says they didn’t like the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.787 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter explicitly states 'I didnt like the movie' and points out awkward elements. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #65 w 0.123 I was always off put by Dakota Johnson’s acting. This movie made me realize she is actually a lizard person pretending to be a human actor. Its the only thing that makes sense VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.103 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Mocks Dakota Johnson’s performance in this film as inhuman and unconvincing, implying a negative viewing experience. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mocks Dakota Johnson's acting in this film as inhuman, a criticism of the performance. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Mocks Dakota Johnson's acting as unhuman and off-putting; the joke implies criticism of the performance, with no praise of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Harshly criticizes the lead actress's performance in the movie. Grok 4.7: negative — Mocks the lead's acting as unconvincing and inhuman. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize Dakota Johnson’s acting in the movie, suggesting it negatively affected their experience. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says they were always put off by the lead's acting and the film reinforced that, a joking but clearly negative take on the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter strongly criticizes Dakota Johnson's acting, calling her a lizard person, which reflects a negative view of the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #66 w 0.122 the fake Call Her Daddy podcast and hot wings interview were so fucking weird lmao VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.443 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.62 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Calls the film’s fake podcast and hot wings interview scenes weird, expressing criticism without praise. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on weird scenes with amusement but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the film's marketing (fake podcast and interview) as weird, without giving a judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment remarks on specific weird elements without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Comments on weird marketing bits, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the podcast and interview being weird, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on specific scenes being weird, with no overall judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment makes a casual observation about weird elements without expressing a clear positive or negative verdict. | + | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #67 w 0.121 After this movie I am now convinced Dakota Johnson is secretly a lizard person trying to act like how a human acts. Anne Hathaway sat in a chair for most of the movie and still did better. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.796 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Mocks Dakota Johnson’s acting as unnatural, contrasting it unfavorably with Hathaway’s largely seated performance. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mocks Dakota Johnson's lead performance as inhuman and wooden; the joke is a criticism of the film's acting. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Mocks Dakota Johnson's performance as robotic and unfavorably compares it to Hathaway's, a criticism of the film's acting with no offsetting praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Harshly criticises Dakota Johnson's lead performance, comparing it unfavourably to Anne Hathaway sitting in a chair. Grok 4.7: negative — Mocks Dakota Johnson’s unnatural acting and prefers Hathaway’s performance. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the acting, saying Dakota Johnson seemed inhuman and Anne Hathaway performed better. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.796 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes Dakota Johnson's acting performance and compares it unfavorably to another actor. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #68 w 0.12 I had so much fun with this movie, especially with that twist, after twist, it felt pretty soapy, but it was addicting. I really like Anne Hathaway's energy in here, it's like she knows the story itself was ridiculous, I kinda wished Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett brought the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.883 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Had fun with the addictive twists and praised Hathaway, despite wishing the other leads matched her energy. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Had so much fun, found it addicting, praised Hathaway; minor wish about co-stars' energy doesn't outweigh enjoyment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they had so much fun, found it addictive and enjoyed the twists; minor criticism of two actors' energy doesn't change the overall positive lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter had 'so much fun' and found it 'addicting' despite minor critiques of two actors. Grok 4.7: positive — Had fun and found the soapy twists addicting despite uneven energy. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They had fun and found it addicting, despite criticizing the soapy story and some actors’ energy. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they had so much fun and found it addicting, despite calling it soapy; overall lean is enjoyment. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Had fun, found it addicting, and really liked Anne Hathaway's energy. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 Dakota Johnson and energy just don't mix: I've never seen someone who seems so bored and annoyed to be a millionaire and cast in countless films VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.543 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.83 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes Dakota Johnson’s general energy and career, without judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — General jab at Dakota Johnson's low energy across her career, not a judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes Dakota Johnson's performance as bored and lacking energy; no praise for the film, so the overall verdict leans negative. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes actor Dakota Johnson in general without stating a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the lead as bored and lacking energy in the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Criticizes Dakota Johnson’s screen presence in the film, implying her performance hurts it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticizes Dakota Johnson's performance as bored and lacking energy, implying disappointment with the film's casting and her work in it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes Dakota Johnson's performance and energy in films. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #70 w 0.119 Her “I have resting boring face” line pretty much breaks the fourth wall. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.052 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.81 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Observes a line's fourth-wall implications without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Observation about a line breaking the fourth wall; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a specific line breaking the fourth wall; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a specific line of dialogue without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes a fourth-wall line without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a line’s effect without expressing an opinion about the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a line of dialogue and its meta effect without judging whether the film is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/quote about a line without judging the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #71 w 0.118 I think the twist in this movie is really just that they want things to feel ambiguous when in reality, the letter she finds that Verity wrote makes zero sense and is almost definitely a lie. The husband’s reaction to Lowen telling him about the manuscript makes zero sense if… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.508 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the twist’s forced ambiguity and repeatedly argues that key plot points and character motivations make no sense. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot analysis and theorizing about the letter's truth; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot logic and theories about the twist and letter without clearly stating overall like or dislike of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter analyzes the plot twist and character motivations without stating whether they liked or disliked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot-logic theory about the twist; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the twist and plot logic as making little sense, expressing dissatisfaction with the film’s narrative. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter lists plot holes and says the twist makes zero sense, criticizing the film's logic, though engaging with theory rather than explicitly rejecting it outright. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter points out multiple plot holes and logical inconsistencies, indicating dissatisfaction with the film's writing. | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #72 w 0.117 Totally agree, the letter seemed to be adressed to everyone else but Jeremy. Why did she need to explain him things he's already aware of? Why even write him a letter at all and hiding it in the kid's hiding place? That makes no sense and sounds off. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.782 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.26 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the letter’s narrative logic as nonsensical and implausible. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Questions the letter's logic, likely suggesting it's suspicious in-story; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot point (the letter) and questions its logic, but doesn't give an overall verdict on the film; it reads as a plot analysis. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses in-universe logic of a character's letter (likely plot theory/unreliable narrator discussion) without judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes a key plot device as illogical and off. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the letter plot point as nonsensical and poorly motivated. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.782 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticises plot logic ('That makes no sense and sounds off') regarding the letter. | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Why does it always seem like Dakota Johnson is just playing herself VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.511 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.67 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes Dakota Johnson’s performance as lacking range or distinct characterization. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes Dakota Johnson's lead performance as lacking range, an implied knock on the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment questions Dakota Johnson's range or typecasting, a general remark about the actress that doesn't give an overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only remarks on an actress's general acting style without judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Observation about the actress, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The comment criticizes Dakota Johnson's performance as repetitive, suggesting dissatisfaction with the film's acting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Criticizes Dakota Johnson's acting as always playing herself, a dismissive judgement of her performance in the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the lead actress's performance, indicating dissatisfaction with the film. | + | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #74 w 0.115 It's weird because she's actually really funny in interviews and seems quite cool, but her acting is so wooden. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.439 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the acting as wooden, contrasting it with the actress’s appealing off-screen personality. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticises the actress's wooden acting in the film; the praise is only for her interview persona. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the actress's wooden acting in the film, despite liking her personally in interviews; this is a criticism of the film's performance. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses an actress's general acting style and interview persona without judging the movie itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the lead's acting in the film as wooden. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Criticizes the acting as wooden, expressing a negative view of the film's performance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticises the film's lead acting as wooden, implying disappointment with the performance; praise for her interviews doesn't offset that. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the acting as wooden, indicating a negative verdict on the film's performance. | + | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #75 w 0.115 Because she can’t act VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.76 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.78 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes an actress’s ability, expressing dissatisfaction with the film’s acting. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes an actress's performance in the film, a negative judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the actress's acting ability, a direct criticism of the film's performance, implying a negative judgment. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes an actress's general skill without giving an overall verdict on the film itself (which may be unreleased). Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the acting, a clear negative judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Criticizes the acting, indicating a negative view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the lead actress can't act, a criticism implying dislike of the film's performance and overall quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the acting performance in the film. | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #76 w 0.114 The wood biting and peanutbutter knife scenes were hard watches... thanks Bring Her Back PTSD VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes disturbing scenes and references another film without judging this film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes disturbing scenes as hard to watch, referencing another film; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes certain scenes as hard to watch and references another film; no clear judgement of Verity's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes disturbing scenes as hard to watch without expressing a positive or negative judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes disturbing scenes and a joke; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes disturbing scenes and a PTSD reaction without expressing an opinion on the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions disturbing scenes and a reaction to another film, but gives no clear judgement of this film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter mentions difficult scenes and PTSD from another movie, but expresses no overall verdict on Verity. | + | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #77 w 0.113 The child sliding the knife in and out of his mouth was gross. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.477 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a scene as gross without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a disturbing scene as gross without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a gross scene without stating whether the film itself is good or bad; the grossness is not a criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a gross scene without expressing an overall opinion on the quality of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Calls a scene gross without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a gross scene but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a gross scene without any judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Describing a scene's content without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #78 w 0.113 Did anyone catch where Jeremy said he had to pull his 8 year old daughter’s body out of the lake, but then she and Crew are twins and he looks 4-5 years old??? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.12 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions an apparent inconsistency in the twins’ ages without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Points out a possible continuity/age inconsistency without judging the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment asks about a possible plot inconsistency without giving an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter points out a continuity error regarding character ages without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes a plot inconsistency without judging the film overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Points out a continuity or age discrepancy without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Points out a plot/continuity inconsistency about character ages without judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only asking a plot/continuity question about the movie. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #79 w 0.112 I was thinking the same lol. Caught myself doing mental math anytime crew was on screen. “If the daughter was 8 when she died and it happened last year, that means he must be 9 now. Wait, he looks 6” VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.202 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a character’s apparent age versus the timeline without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking observation about character age continuity; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joking about timeline/age inconsistencies and a child actor's apparent age; it's a nitpick-style observation without an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses a minor casting age discrepancy without giving an overall opinion or verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot-age nitpick and joke; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Points out an age inconsistency but gives no overall opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter discusses child ages and continuity mental math, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot/continuity details without giving a verdict on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #80 w 0.111 So like why didn’t she escape when he went to NYC for at least 24 hrs ? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.541 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Asks about a character’s actions without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot question about a character's choices; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A plot question about a character's choices; it doesn't state whether they liked or disliked the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment asks a plot-related question about a character's actions without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot question about a character choice, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a plot point without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about why a character didn't escape; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking a plot question without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #81 w 0.11 The book makes it clear she knows she’ll need money so she plans on stealing the advance the publishing company is going to pay Lowen for taking over the series. Also she wants to find and dispose of the manuscript to protect her. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.026 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses the book’s plot and character motivations without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains plot details from the book; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Explains book plot details and a character's motives without giving any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details from the book without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Book plot explanation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Explains plot details from the book without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion of the book's storyline with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details from the book without expressing a judgment on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #82 w 0.11 Somehow this film made The Housemaid look like Se7en and Sydney Sweeney look like prime Meryl Streep. This film is laughably bad. First off, Dakota Johnson might be the worst actress in Hollywood, so let’s get that out of the way. Her line delivery was some of the most… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.98 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Calls it laughably bad and among the year's worst, criticizing acting, writing, and editing despite minor praise. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it laughably bad and a contender for worst film of the year, rating it 3/10 despite minor praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls the film "laughably bad," a contender for worst of the year, criticizes acting, writing and editing, and gives it 3/10. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter calls the film "laughably bad," criticizes the acting, writing, and editing, and rates it 3/10. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film laughably bad and a 3/10 worst-of-year contender despite minor praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls it laughably bad and among the year's worst, despite a few minor positives. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film laughably bad, worst of the year, with harsh criticism of acting, plot logic, and editing; 3/10. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the film 'laughably bad' and 'worst film of the year', giving it a 3/10. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #83 w 0.109 Why were the baby monitors, that presumably hadn't been used in 8 years and were used in a different house, in such a prominent place in the pantry? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.318 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions a specific plot detail without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot logic question about baby monitors; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a plot-logic question about baby monitors without clearly stating an overall judgment of the film; it reads as curiosity rather than a verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment asks a question about a specific plot detail without stating an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot logic question only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Questions a plot detail without expressing an opinion about the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about a prop's placement; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only asking a plot-related question about the movie without expressing an opinion. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #84 w 0.108 Plot connivence. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Dismisses the film's plotting as contrived or overly convenient. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Likely means 'plot convenience', a dismissive jab at contrived writing; very terse, so the verdict is uncertain. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calling out 'plot convenience' is a criticism of the film's writing, with no praise to offset it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — A two-word trope answer ('plot convenience') without enough context to establish an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls out plot convenience as a flaw in the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling the plot contrived is a criticism of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the plot 'connivance' (contrived), a criticism implying the film's storyline is implausible or manipulative. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's writing quality. | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #85 w 0.108 I’m going to be honest, I left feeling a little disappointed. Of course Anne Hathaway’s acting was phenomenal, but I just felt some of the script and dialogue could’ve been better VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.654 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Overall disappointment with the film and criticism of its script outweigh praise for Anne Hathaway’s acting. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Overall disappointed; praises Hathaway's acting but criticizes script and dialogue, leaning negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter left disappointed and criticised script and dialogue; praise of Hathaway's acting is outweighed by overall disappointment. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states they left feeling disappointed due to issues with the script and dialogue. Grok 4.7: negative — Left disappointed; praised acting but criticized script and dialogue. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They praise Hathaway’s acting but say they left disappointed and criticize the script and dialogue. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Leaves feeling disappointed; praises Hathaway's acting but criticises the script and dialogue, leaning negative overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter felt disappointed by the script and dialogue despite good acting. | + | + | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Michael Showalter directed this?? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.24 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Expresses surprise about the director without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Surprise about the director; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Expresses surprise about the director; no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Expresses surprise about the director without offering any opinion or judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Only questions the director; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses surprise about the director without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only asks about the director; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter expresses surprise about the director without stating a verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #87 w 0.107 To be fair I think this was competently directed. The problem is everything else. Maybe what we saw was the best of 50 takes trying to extract something from Dakota until they gave up and canonized her having a resting bored face. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.402 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Praises competent direction but criticizes everything else, especially Dakota's performance. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Concedes competent direction but says everything else is the problem, mocking the lead performance. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Grants competent direction but says everything else is the problem, mocking Dakota's bored performance; overall critical of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the acting and says "the problem is everything else" despite competent direction. Grok 4.7: negative — Concedes competent direction but says everything else is the problem. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They praise the direction but criticize everything else, especially Dakota's performance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.402 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes everything except the direction, specifically calling out poor acting and script issues. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #88 w 0.106 I ultimately went because I'd seen all of Anne Hathaway's other movies this year in theaters (yes I'm one of the eight people who bought a ticket for Mother Mary), and despite my distaste for Colleen Hoover it seemed a pity not to complete the series. And to her credit, Anne… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.959 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Despite praising Hathaway, they call the film a mess, criticize its ending and performances, and find it streaming-quality. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises Hathaway but calls the film a mess with a failed ending and weak lead; overall negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls the film 'a mess' with a failed ending and weak craft; only Hathaway's performance is praised, raising the score by a point. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Despite praising Hathaway's performance, the commenter calls the movie a frustrating mess with a failed ending and poor co-star acting. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film a mess with a failed ending, despite praising Hathaway. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite praising Anne Hathaway, they call the movie a mess, criticize its ending and performances, and describe it as streaming fodder. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the movie 'a mess' and says it failed to stick its ending; praise for Hathaway is outweighed by overall criticism. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the movie a mess, criticizes the execution and ending, and notes the audience checked their phones. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #89 w 0.105 Dakota's acting is the same dull monotone delivery in every movie I've seen of hers, I'll never be convinced she's a good actress or is even considered one. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.264 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes Dakota's acting generally, without explicitly judging this film or her performance in it. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the lead actress's dull monotone performance, implicitly including this film; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes lead actress's performance as dull and monotone, implying a poor verdict on the film's acting, though framed as a general complaint about her. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes the lead actress's general acting ability without offering a verdict on this specific film. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the lead performance as dull and unconvincing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize Dakota's performance in the film as dull and unconvincing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticizes the lead actress's monotone acting and says they're unconvinced she's good, implying dislike of her performance in the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the lead actress's performance and states she is not a good actress. | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #90 w 0.105 Ending a movie with a Hot Ones interview has to be the funniest thing in cinema history VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.557 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film’s ending the funniest thing in cinema history, expressing enjoyment. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about the Hot Ones ending; amusement could be mockery or enjoyment, with no clear judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Jokes about the ending featuring a Hot Ones interview; amusing remark but no clear judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a specific scene without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film's ending the funniest thing in cinema history. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the ending as exceptionally funny, expressing a positive reaction to the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the ending's Hot Ones interview 'the funniest thing in cinema history', an enthusiastic praise of the film's ending. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a specific scene without expressing an overall positive or negative verdict on the film. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #91 w 0.104 I enjoyed the movie but it felt drawn out and random at places. The nurse giving Lowen random updates on Verity were odd. Ok Verity is sleeping, why tf would Lowen care? I started to think maybe the nurse knew more than she let on but her character went no where. Lowen and… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.986 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly enjoyed the movie and rated it 6/10, despite substantial criticism of pacing, character development, and plot logic. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Says enjoyed it but lists many flaws: drawn out, awkward romance, pointless nurse; 6/10 for potential. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says they enjoyed it and were shocked by the twist, but lists many criticisms (drawn out, odd pacing, plot holes); 6/10 suggests no strong lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Enjoyed the movie and was shocked by the twist, but criticized pacing, writing, and gave a middling 6/10. Grok 4.7: mixed — Enjoyed it but found it drawn-out and flawed; rates 6/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They enjoyed it and were surprised by the twist, but found several story and character choices awkward and rated it 6/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER -0.986 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Enjoyed the movie and gave it a 6/10, but noted several flaws and felt it was drawn out. | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #92 w 0.104 Dakota is the same in every movie. Zero range, yet she keeps getting lead roles. Astonishing. Anne understood the assignment, the only good acting performance. The movie was bad, even for a trashy thriller. Maybe different actors for Lowen and Jeremy could have elevated it a… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.052 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Explicitly calls the movie bad, criticizing its acting and pacing despite praising Anne's performance. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls the movie bad, criticizes acting and pacing; praise for Anne doesn't outweigh overall negative verdict. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — States the movie was bad even for a trashy thriller, criticizes lead acting and pacing; only Anne's performance is praised. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Explicitly states 'the movie was bad' and criticizes the lead acting and pacing. Grok 4.7: negative — Explicitly calls the movie bad; criticizes acting and pacing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls the movie bad, criticizes the pacing and acting, and says different casting might have improved it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Criticises lead actress, pacing, and calls the movie bad even for a trashy thriller; only one performance praised. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Explicitly states the movie was bad with poor pacing and acting. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #93 w 0.103 I understand, for time, why they cut some stuff but god the book is so much more fucked up and we could have gotten rid of the entire birthday sequence to dive more into the twin girls, her hating both then having the dream then mainly hating Harper and then the other twin… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.679 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly calls it a good movie, despite disappointment with omitted book material and the adaptation’s depth. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Calls it a good movie but repeatedly expresses dissatisfaction with cuts and lack of depth versus book. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says 'it's a good movie' but laments cuts and unsatisfying adaptation versus the book; leans slightly positive but with clear criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Calls it a 'good movie' but expresses clear dissatisfaction and disappointment with cut material compared to the book. Grok 4.7: mixed — Calls it a good movie but criticizes cuts and feels unsatisfied. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Calls it a good movie but criticizes major omissions and says they weren’t satisfied. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.679 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — The user calls it a good movie but expresses disappointment with the adaptation compared to the book. | − | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #94 w 0.103 I liked it, though it kind of fell apart for me at the end. Hiding that long ass confession note for Jeremy under the floorboards (where Crew apparently has full access) made absolutely no fucking sense to me, nor the idea of writing one's "autobiography" as a complete fiction.… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.812 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Despite liking most of it, they ultimately felt disappointed by the ending, implausible plotting, and protagonist. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Says they liked most of it, but the ending fell apart and it ultimately disappointed; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says they liked most of it but criticizes the ending's logic and Lowen's characterization, ending with 'ultimately disappointed me'; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — The commenter explicitly states they liked most of the movie, but the ending ultimately disappointed them. Grok 4.7: negative — Liked most of it, but ultimately disappointed by the ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite liking most of it, they say it ultimately disappointed them and criticize the ending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER -0.812 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Liked most of it, but plot issues and the ending ultimately caused disappointment. | − | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #95 w 0.102 This is probably not going to appeal to the demographic of /r/movies , and it certainly has its issues, but man. I miss salacious thrillers so much in the studio landscape it was nice to see one that is just that through and through, and I have a lot of thoughts on Colleen… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.996 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enjoys the salacious thriller despite flaws, praising its performances, humor, pacing, and commitment to sexy trash. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoys it as fun sexy trash, praises Johnson and Hathaway; acknowledges issues but leans clearly positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Acknowledges issues but clearly enjoyed it as fun, salacious trash; praises Dakota Johnson and Anne's performances and the film's approach. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Enjoyed it as a fun, campy thriller, praising the performances, comedy, and pacing despite acknowledging some flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Acknowledges flaws but clearly enjoys the sexy thriller and performances. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoy the film’s sexy-trash thriller style, performances, comedy, and pacing, while acknowledging some issues. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.996 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter acknowledges flaws but praises the film's fun, trashy thriller nature and good performances. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #96 w 0.102 I think the better ending would have been that Lowen wrote the autobiography to manipulate Jeremy into killing Verity. Verity was actually incapacitated but Lowen was crazy. We find out later she had asked him questions to write the autobiography not to confirm it. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.7 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Proposes an alternative ending without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Proposes an alternative ending; implies mild preference but gives no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Proposes an alternative ending theory about the plot; no clear overall judgement of the film itself, though it implies mild dissatisfaction with the ending. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The user pitches an alternate ending idea without stating whether they liked or disliked the overall film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Alternative-ending theory and plot speculation, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They suggest a different, better ending, implying dissatisfaction with the film’s actual ending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.7 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a hypothetical alternative plot and ending without expressing a verdict on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #97 w 0.101 Dakota “Let me step back and interrogate this kid about the tragic / traumatic death of his sister” Johnson VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.891 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Jokes about a character’s insensitive behavior without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke mocking a character's behavior in one scene; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking reference to a character/actor's actions in the plot, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a character's actions in the plot without giving a verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Sarcastic joke about a scene, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Mocks a character’s behavior but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Snarky joke about a character's interrogation scene; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only makes a joke about a character's action without judging the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #98 w 0.101 Anyone else feel like the movie made it seem like the husband had something to do with it all??? The bicycle scene felt planned. He told lowen he didn’t know her until he said her name but later in the movie he said he was the one who actually liked her book? & then when he… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.653 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses plot theories and character motivations without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter shares plot theories and questions about characters without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses plot theories and questions about the husband and Lowen without stating whether they liked the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is entirely plot discussion and character theories without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theories and questions only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot clues and theories but gives no judgment about whether the film was good or enjoyable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot theories and questions about the husband's role; no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses plot theories and asks questions without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #99 w 0.1 Uhhhh did y'all forget to attach an ending VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.226 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.37 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Sarcastically criticizes the film for lacking a proper ending. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Sarcastically implies the film lacks a proper ending, criticising how it concludes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Sarcastically complains the film's ending is missing or abrupt, implying disappointment with the film's conclusion. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's abrupt or incomplete ending, expressing dissatisfaction. Grok 4.7: negative — Sarcastically criticizes the film for lacking a real ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for seeming to lack an ending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Sarcastic complaint that the film has no ending, implying it felt unfinished and unsatisfying. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Complaining about the ending implies dissatisfaction with the film. | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |