Heart of the Beast
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (LIVE) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (LIVE) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #7 74 Depends R 66 55/10/34 | #8 67 Depends R 50 35/36/28 | #5 62 Depends R 40 15/61/23 | #7 81 Watch R 82 30/61/8 | #7 83 Watch R 85 32/60/7 | #7 83 Watch R 85 34/57/8 | #7 85 Watch R 90 33/61/5 | #7 83 Watch R 85 32/60/7 | #7 83 Watch R 84 34/56/9 | #7 81 Watch R 81 32/58/9 | #7 80 Watch R 80 32/57/10 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 JK Simmons character felt like he was super natural . Maybe he was death or a spirit of the Forrest. Him going off on his boat gave off Charon on the river styx vibe Also when they crossed that one marsh it felt like “The valley of the shadow of death” VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.87 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.12 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Interprets the character’s supernatural symbolism and mythological parallels without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretive theory about Simmons' character as death or a spirit; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter offers interpretation and theories about JK Simmons' character and symbolism, without stating whether they liked or recommend the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only provides character theories and thematic analysis without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Symbolic character theories only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Interprets the character and imagery but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers theories and literary comparisons about the character without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses character theories and symbolism without expressing a like or dislike for the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #1 w 0.707 When you look at it like that and add in how un modern his kayak/boat was definitely could of been something else, even leaves a book with a perfect quote summing up james and Odin VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.836 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and symbolism without expressing an opinion on the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot interpretation about the kayak and the book quote, with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and theories about a character's boat and a book quote, without giving any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses plot elements and theories without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about boat and book quote; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses possible plot clues and symbolism without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details, the boat, and a book quote without clearly judging whether the film itself is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and themes without expressing a clear opinion on the film's quality. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #2 w 0.577 His last quote from the book made me cry right there. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.477 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.19 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction to a quote without judging the film or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes being moved by one quote, but gives no explicit judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was moved to tears by a quote in the film, implying an emotionally affecting, favorable reaction, though no explicit recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses an emotional reaction to a quote from the book without clearly judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Emotional reaction to a book quote, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The final quote moved them to tears, signaling an emotionally affecting and appreciated moment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions a book quote that made them cry, but gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses an emotional reaction to a book quote without expressing a judgment of the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #3 w 0.5 I was pretty sure he was Charon, too- but it's super clear that Pitt dies at the beginning of the movie, when it cuts back. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.866 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses character identity and a plot interpretation without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation about a character possibly being Charon; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot theory about a character being Charon and Pitt's death, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot points and character theories without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about a character's identity and death; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot interpretation without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot theory about who a character is and when they die; no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot theory without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film itself. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #4 w 0.447 It is not clear. I thought Odin was waiting for someone so he could bring help back. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.132 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The commenter interprets Odin's actions without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot interpretation about Odin's motives without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses plot ambiguity and a theory about a character, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot detail without expressing any opinion or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot confusion only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter expresses confusion about the plot, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot confusion and interpretation of a character's motive; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing plot confusion without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #5 w 0.408 I kept that hope alive even after seeing clearly deceased Pitt on that rock. I thought maybe he's just kinda comatose. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.802 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses hope for a character’s survival without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes emotional reaction to a plot event without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment recounts personal reaction to a plot point (hoping a character survived) without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely discusses a plot point and character death without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's death, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a plot point without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion about a character's apparent fate; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only discussing the plot and a character's fate without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #6 w 0.378 Ngl I had to double take when they showed James body that following morning just to be sure, like yeah he looks ice cold he's gone 🤬 😂. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.881 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a reaction to a character’s death without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reacts to a scene showing a character's body; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a reaction to a plot moment (character's death scene) with humor, but gives no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only describes a specific scene and plot point without expressing an opinion on the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Reacts to a character's death scene; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They react to a character's apparent death without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot moment (a character's body shown) with emoji reaction; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is reacting to a plot point and joking, not expressing a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #7 w 0.354 The mournful howl after that is where it sent me crying through the rest of the movie and had to put my hoodie up as i was leaving the theater :( VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.823 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a strong emotional reaction without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter was deeply moved, crying through the film; emotional impact reads as praise, not criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was emotionally moved to tears through the rest of the film and afterward, implying a strongly positive reaction. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter had a strong, genuine emotional reaction to the film, crying throughout the rest of it. Grok 4.7: positive — Cried through the rest; moved by the film, not criticizing it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The scene moved them deeply and kept them crying; the sad reaction signals emotional impact, not criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter was moved to tears by the film's emotional scene, implying a strong, favorable emotional response to it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Strong emotional impact and crying indicate a powerful, positive cinematic experience. | − | − | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #8 w 0.333 Yup you’re not the only one I made an audible cry thinking about my baby girl who died in my arms. On her last day she waited until I got home because no matter how bad she was she would be excited that I was home. Just typing this is making me tear up again. Fuck VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.908 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.31 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.29 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Shares grief about a personal loss and emotional reaction, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares personal grief triggered by the film; emotional reaction without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a personal, emotional story about a deceased pet prompted by the film, but gives no explicit judgement of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter shares a personal story about a pet passing away without evaluating the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Personal grief story; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They share personal grief, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Personal grief story tied to the film's emotional impact; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is sharing a personal tragic anecdote triggered by the film without evaluating the movie itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #9 w 0.316 Felt this exact same way when I saw his boat. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — References a reaction to seeing a boat without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reaction to a scene or comment, with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a personal reaction to a specific element (a boat) with no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment reacts to a specific detail (the boat) without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees about a boat; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses a reaction to seeing a boat, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Vague reference to a scene ('his boat') with no stated judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a brief remark about a specific detail without judging the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #10 w 0.302 Immediately went home and gave my dogs some love VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.637 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a post-viewing reaction involving their dogs, without evaluating the film or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction after watching, but gives no explicit judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a personal reaction (hugging dogs) but gives no explicit judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Expresses an emotional reaction relating to their own pets without judging whether the film itself was good or bad. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Personal reaction only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The film prompted an affectionate, emotionally engaged reaction toward their dogs. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is about the commenter's reaction to going home and loving their dogs; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Reaction to the film's emotional impact on pets, but no explicit verdict on the movie itself. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #11 w 0.289 Oden deserves a Best actor nomination. Can the Academy introduce two awards: Kid actor and best animal actor. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.908 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Award-worthy praise for Oden’s performance signals a positive reaction to the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises an actor's performance as nomination-worthy, implying strong approval of the film's performances. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the lead performance as worthy of a Best Actor nomination, implying a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the performance of an animal actor in the film, suggesting they deserve an award. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a performance as Oscar-worthy, implying approval of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strong praise for Oden’s performance implies the commenter appreciated the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the lead performance strongly, suggesting awards recognition for the actor and animal co-star, implying approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the acting performance strongly implies the commenter liked the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #12 w 0.277 And best animal stunt double. Odin is mainly played by Uber the retired mountain rescue dog, while his sons Ryker, Zika, Hondo handled the stunts for their dad. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.872 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Shares trivia about the animal actors and stunt doubles without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Trivia about the dogs who played Odin; joke award mention, no clear judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Trivia about the dog actors and stunt doubles; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Shares trivia about the dog actors without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about the dog stunt doubles, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Provides trivia about the dogs performing the role and stunts, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Trivia about animal performers in the film; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses animal stunt doubles and trivia without judging the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #13 w 0.267 Oh yeah I immediately gave my dogs hugs when I got back VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.66 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction after watching, without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — An emotional reaction (hugging their dogs afterward) with no explicit judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about hugging their dogs after viewing; implies emotional impact but gives no explicit judgement of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction involving their pets after watching, without expressing a clear opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Personal reaction about hugging dogs; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes hugging their dogs after watching, but gives no judgment or recommendation of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment describes the viewer hugging their dogs afterward, with no explicit judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment shares a personal reaction without evaluating the film itself. | + | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #14 w 0.258 From the moment the movie begins you see the love of a dog in Odin's eyes. My dogs look at me that same way. As James says at the end, he showed Odin war, and Odin showed nothing but love and trust back. That is what the movie is about to me. It's about the undying love of a… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.485 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises the film’s portrayal of canine love and loyalty, explicitly rating it 10/10. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter interprets the film's themes warmly and explicitly rates it 10/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film's emotional theme of a dog's love and gives it 10/10. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly connects with the movie's themes and explicitly rates it "10/10 for me." Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film’s theme and rates it 10/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the film a powerful story about a dog's love and gives it 10/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.485 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses clear praise, concluding with a 10/10 rating. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #15 w 0.25 I agree! Conveyed in this letter. *Dont read if you have not seen the movie* 😄 Dear Stranger, My name is James Belmont. If you’re reading this, it means I’m dead. Several days ago, I suffered a heart attack and crashed my plane approximately 50 miles west of this location. I… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.996 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.19 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Quotes an emotional letter from the film without expressing a clear judgment of the movie itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Agrees with an unseen comment, then transcribes the film's letter without judging the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Opens with "I agree!" and shares the film's touching letter approvingly, implying they share a favorable view, though no explicit evaluation is given. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only provides a quote/letter from the movie without expressing any personal judgment on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quotes a letter from the film; no judgment of the movie itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment quotes a letter from the film but gives no clear opinion about the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a fictional letter from the film's plot without judging the film itself; no stated opinion of it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter shares a plot-related quote and letter from the movie without expressing a personal verdict. | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 Thanks dude. Made me cry in the cinema and now again. Beautifully written. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.542 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.65 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Describes being moved to tears in the cinema and praises the writing as beautiful. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — The film moved them to tears in the cinema; crying is framed as a positive emotional impact. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the film made them cry in the cinema and calls it beautifully written, indicating emotional, appreciative praise. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter had a strong emotional reaction in the cinema and praises the writing as beautiful. Grok 4.7: positive — Cried in the cinema and praises the writing as beautiful. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the writing and describe being moved to tears. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film made them cry, in the cinema and again, and praises it as beautifully written. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as beautifully written and emotionally impactful. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #17 w 0.236 Cried at the movies last night, now I'm crying again at work. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.361 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.59 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — The lingering emotional impact and repeated tears suggest the film deeply moved them. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Being moved to tears again a day later signals strong emotional impact, implying appreciation of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Crying during and after the film, still emotionally affected, implies a strongly moving experience, read as praise rather than criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Expressing a lingering, deep emotional reaction of crying indicates the movie had a powerful, effective impact. Grok 4.7: positive — Crying at the film and again later shows it moved them deeply. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They say the movie made them cry, but don't say whether they liked it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Crying at the film is framed as an emotional response, implying it moved them; the tone reads as a positive reaction to the movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Crying from a film indicates an emotional, powerful, and positive viewing experience. | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #18 w 0.229 I'm a combat vet and I saw this yesterday on the anniversary of a major battle where I lost many "fallen brothers". Wow. Rough day to watch this wonderful movie. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.021 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it a wonderful movie; the difficult viewing experience reflects personal grief, not criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a 'wonderful movie'; emotional difficulty reflects personal connection, not criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a "wonderful movie"; the emotional difficulty of watching it is not a criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly describes it as a "wonderful movie". Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a wonderful movie despite personal timing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a wonderful movie, despite the emotionally difficult timing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.021 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly calls the film a 'wonderful movie'. | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #19 w 0.224 when odin moaned after pitt died, it reminded me of my lab moaning and howling when we had to put my golden down due to cancer, she knew her buddy had passed and made those same noises as he passed. heart wrenching VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.681 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a scene’s emotional resonance with personal grief without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a personal anecdote about a sad scene's realism without explicitly judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a personal memory triggered by a scene; 'heart wrenching' describes emotional impact but gives no explicit judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Describes a scene as emotionally impactful and 'heart wrenching,' relating it deeply to a personal experience. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Personal anecdote about a scene; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The scene moved them deeply; calling it heart-wrenching signals an effective emotional impact. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Personal anecdote about a dog's grief; describes a scene emotionally but gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is sharing a personal emotional anecdote related to a scene, not judging the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #20 w 0.218 People are overanalyzing this film too much. Sure, a satellite phone ends this movie in 20 minute. But why does everyone seems to have a problem with how he dies, but not all the other unrealistic stuff like a German Shepherd fighting multiple wolves, or him surviving in the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.911 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.73 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film emotional and enjoyable despite predictability, and praises the dog. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Defends film against nitpicks, calls it emotional and enjoyable despite predictability, praises the dog. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Defends the film against nitpicking, calls it emotional, enjoyable, and praises the dog; acknowledges predictability but leans clearly positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Acknowledges unrealistic and predictable elements, but explicitly concludes the film is emotional, enjoyable, and praises the dog. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it predictable yet emotional, enjoyable, and praises the dog. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it emotional and enjoyable, praises the dog, and treats the plot criticisms as overanalysis. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Defends the film against overanalysis, calls it emotional and enjoyable, praises the dog, and says they'll take their dog to see it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the film emotional and enjoyable, and praises the dog. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #21 w 0.213 At the risk of being one of those that are over analyzing it, I think he died because of blood loss. That’s why they showed the camera cut of the blood flowing like water and his skin turning darker as he got closer to dying. He already had the broken arm that was bleeding and… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.922 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.66 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Analyzes the character’s cause of death without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains the character's death through plot analysis; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot analysis explaining the character's cause of death, with no judgment of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only analyzes the plot and cause of a character's death without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about a character's death; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about the character’s cause of death and the plot’s realism without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Analyzes the cause of a character's death in the plot without judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details and theories about the character's death without judging the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #22 w 0.209 It was definitely from blood loss, that bite wound on his side was too gnarly it needed immediate care. When I first saw how bad he was bleeding on the rock, that was the first moment of oh shi he's not gonna make it VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.026 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.43 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a character's wound and likely cause of death without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character's injury and death cause; describes a reaction but gives no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details (cause of character's death, bite wound) without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot point and character death without expressing an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's injury, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the character’s injury and reaction to the scene without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail (cause of death from a bite wound) without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot details and character fate without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #23 w 0.204 He was also taking alot of aspirin for the heart attack and it thins your blood. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.43 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Explains a character's aspirin use and its effects without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot explanation about aspirin thinning blood; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses a plot or character detail (aspirin thinning blood after a heart attack) without giving any judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely discusses a plot point or medical detail without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot detail about a character's medication, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Factual comment about aspirin and blood thinning, with no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a plot detail about aspirin and blood thinning, with no judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only discusses a plot detail without judging the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #24 w 0.2 Winner! I’m a 15-year WFR, and the wound care/treatment was pretty spot on, even the care for the open fracture. Pull traction, splint, sling, keep walking. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.888 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.77 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Enthusiastically praises the film’s accurate portrayal of wilderness wound care and fracture treatment. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a 'Winner!' and praises the accuracy of its wound care from a wilderness first responder's view. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film's medical accuracy as a wilderness first responder, calling it 'Winner' and 'pretty spot on'; implies approval, though not an overall verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the movie a 'Winner!' and praises the accuracy of the medical treatment depicted. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a winner and praises realistic wound care. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a winner and praises the wound care and treatment as accurate. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.888 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Calls the movie a 'Winner!' and praises the accuracy of the medical treatment. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #25 w 0.196 They showed a direct shot of him being bitten on the stomach by a huge wolf, the resulting deep wound to his abdomen and blood pouring from it hours later twice My interpretation was they were inviting the viewer to draw an inference that this was a serious and potentially… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.052 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.30 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Interprets the depiction of a character’s wound without evaluating the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets a plot detail about the wound; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a plot point and offers an interpretation of the wound's seriousness, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely discusses plot details and character injuries without expressing any opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene interpretation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes an injury scene and its implications without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a gory scene and offers an interpretation of it, with no judgement of whether the film is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot interpretation and a specific scene without expressing an opinion on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #26 w 0.192 I thought he knew he was going to die just trying to get Odin close to the road VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.599 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a character's intentions and fate without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation about a character's intentions; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation about a character's intent; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion regarding character motivations with no opinion expressed on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's intent, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character’s intentions in the plot without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's knowledge; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion and speculation without expressing a personal verdict on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #27 w 0.189 How’s this for over analyzing, I don’t think he survived the plane crash. Lots of Greek/roman underworld imagery was taking place. It’s starts with him meeting the boatman and he gives him two coins to enter the underworld (2 beers), he’s traveling along the river (Styx), and… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.527 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.41 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Offers an afterlife interpretation of the plot without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretive theory about underworld imagery; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter offers an interpretive theory about the plot and mythological imagery without stating whether they liked or recommend the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment shares a plot theory and thematic analysis without expressing any opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Mythology theory about the plot; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers a plot interpretation and mythological theory without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Pure theory about symbolism and plot interpretation; no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a plot theory and symbolism without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 I like your idea that Simmons was the Boatman to the Underworld, and took his fee in two bottles of Belgian beer, maybe a prepayment in case James did survive the crash? He, the Boatman, did remark that James was further out than anybody he'd seen before. It adds another layer… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.841 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses symbolism, character motivations, and the title’s meaning without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Thematic interpretation and theory discussion without an explicit judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretive discussion of themes and symbolism without explicitly stating whether the film was good or recommended. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment engages in plot and thematic analysis without expressing a personal opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Thematic plot interpretation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the story’s thematic depth and the meaning behind its title. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.841 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot theories and themes without expressing a clear verdict on the film. | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #29 w 0.183 There's a lot of Viking references as well. The dog's name is Odin and the first person they met in the film is a wandering stranger dressed in furs with a hat who shares a drink and a story then disappears while leaving a bit of knowledge before an arduous journey. You hear… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.115 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses Viking imagery and references without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Lists Viking references and imagery in the film without stating whether they liked or disliked it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter lists Viking references and imagery in the film without stating whether they liked it or would recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely points out Viking imagery and references in the plot without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Lists Viking imagery and references without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment catalogs Viking imagery and references without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes Viking references and imagery in the film without expressing any overall opinion of it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses movie details and Viking symbolism without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #30 w 0.18 The wolves were biting at his flak jacket and also his carbon fiber/titanium leg. Odin merely fought them off. But there is some credibility to a combat vet dog having a much more ferocious intensity than an ordinary shepherd. Plus, not every wolf is 150 lb killer. I am a big… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.914 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.35 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses the wolf scene’s plausibility and defends its realism without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plausibility of wolf fight scene; no overall judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and realism of the wolf scene, defending its plausibility, but gives no overall judgment of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the realism of a specific scene involving wolves and a dog without stating an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses scene realism and wolves, no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the plausibility of a scene and wolf behavior, without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plausibility of a scene and wolf facts without stating whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses plot plausibility and animal behavior without expressing a clear like or dislike of the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #31 w 0.177 I have to say I’m a sucker for dog movies, so while this didn’t break any new ground, I loved it. The aurora borealis scene was particularly beautiful and heart-wrenching. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.69 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the film despite its lack of originality, praising a scene as beautiful and heart-wrenching. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Admits it's unoriginal but says they loved it and praises the aurora scene as beautiful. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved it despite it not breaking new ground, and praises the aurora borealis scene as beautiful and heart-wrenching. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and praised a specific scene as beautiful and heart-wrenching. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film despite it not breaking new ground. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the film despite its lack of originality and praise its beautiful, heart-wrenching scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter explicitly says they loved it and praises a specific scene, despite noting it breaks no new ground. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter admits they loved the movie despite it not breaking new ground. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #32 w 0.174 Why do most people in the comments feel like a movie has to break new ground in order to be considered good? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.66 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.03 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions originality as a criterion for quality without explicitly judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Meta-comment on other commenters' standards; no stated judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Rhetorical question about other commenters' standards for a good film; gives no explicit verdict on Heart of the Beast itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter criticizes other people's comments rather than stating their own opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Questions others' standards; no clear judgement of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Questions others’ standards for judging movies without stating an opinion of this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a general question about audience expectations; does not express a verdict on the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses general audience expectations and film criticism without expressing a verdict on the movie itself. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #33 w 0.171 Because they are snobs or just contrarians. "Popular bad, me special". VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.103 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes other people's attitudes toward popularity without expressing a personal judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Dismisses the film's detractors as snobs and contrarians, implicitly defending the film, though there is no explicit praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment insults unnamed critics' motives without stating any opinion about the film itself; the verdict on the film is only implied at best. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment criticizes other viewers or critics without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Mocks other viewers' attitudes, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — It criticizes people’s reasons for disliking something but does not state an opinion of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a general jab at snobs and contrarians, not a clear judgement of this film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses other people's opinions about popularity, not the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #34 w 0.169 Haven’t cried this hard at a movie in a long ass time. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.527 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Highlights the film’s powerful emotional impact, implying appreciation rather than criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Strong emotional impact described as a powerful experience; crying hard implies the film deeply moved them. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Crying hard at a movie signals a strong emotional impact, which the commenter presents as a positive experience of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Expressing a strong emotional reaction (crying hard) indicates the film was deeply moving and effective. Grok 4.7: positive — Cried harder than in a long time; deeply moved. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The intense emotional reaction suggests the film had a powerful, appreciated impact. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they cried hard and hasn't in a long time, implying strong emotional impact, which reads as praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Crying hard at a movie indicates a powerful, deeply moving positive emotional impact. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #35 w 0.167 Yeah I just watched. Personally it's just me and my lovely doggie facing a very tough life alone together recently, living amongst the Welsh mountains, so this movie felt close to home. She has helped keep me safe (and sane) in some very difficult situations. The ending really… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.761 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — The film resonated deeply, and its unexpectedly moving ending clearly made a strong positive impression. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Film felt personally resonant; the ending deeply moved them and subverted their expectations of a predictable finish. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was deeply moved by the film, found it personally resonant, and was surprised by its non-predictable ending; clearly emotionally positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The movie resonated deeply with the commenter and they appreciated the impactful, non-predictable ending. Grok 4.7: positive — Emotionally moved; appreciated the unexpected, non-Hollywood ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The film felt close to home, and its ending deeply moved them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.761 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses personal connection and emotional reaction to the ending without explicitly reviewing or judging the film quality. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #36 w 0.164 Same here, I ran across the parking lot and cried all the way home. I could hardly see how to drive. I even cried a little today. That movie brought back some recent bad memories. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.318 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.52 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes crying and resurfacing painful memories, but does not judge the film’s quality or recommend it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a strong emotional reaction and painful memories, but never says whether they liked or disliked the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a strong emotional reaction and personal memories, but never states whether they liked the film or would recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes an intense personal emotional reaction triggered by personal memories, without evaluating whether the movie itself was good. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes personal distress and memories, not a film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction and personal memories, but gives no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter cried and was emotionally shaken, but the tearful reaction stems from bad memories it evoked, not praise of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses personal emotional triggers and memories rather than judging the film's quality. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 |
| thread #37 w 0.162 Its sad, very sad movie. I wish I hadn't watched it. My Dad had a heart attack on August 3 he survived doing decent my best favorite dog passed on the 16th ive cried until I cant. Just starting to get over it and now the movie brought all that back. I should have left. I cried… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.241 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Explicitly regrets watching and wishes he had left because the film painfully resurfaced personal grief. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Wishes they hadn't watched it, says they should have left. Comment also signals possible suicide risk; consider escalating. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says they wish they hadn't watched it and regrets going, though the distress stems largely from personal circumstances; overall regret about the viewing. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter regrets watching due to personal grief and emotional triggers, rather than judging the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Regrets watching; found it unbearably sad and upsetting, not praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They explicitly wish they hadn't watched it and describe the experience as deeply upsetting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.241 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter deeply regrets watching the movie because it caused severe emotional distress and depression. | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #38 w 0.16 With all due respect, you're not going to get over it. It's not something that ever passes, it just dulls with time. The universe has a funny way of reminding us of things that hurt us, but that doesn't mean that we should forget them. The fact that this movie hit multiple… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.958 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.54 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Offers emotional support and discusses another viewer's experience without expressing their own judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Supportive reply about personal grief; no judgement of the film's quality by the commenter. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter offers emotional support to another user about personal pain; no explicit judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter offers personal empathy to another user without expressing a judgment or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Advice about grief triggered by the film, not a judgment of it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers empathy about the movie touching personal pain, but gives no clear opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.958 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Encourages the user to continue enjoying the movie despite its painful personal resonance. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #39 w 0.158 Hey brother, let's talk. If you don't like talking on here send me a message. Dump all that shit out on me and we'll get you through this. Think of all the stuff we've survived to get to this moment. After everything that should've killed me I'm still here dammit. You are too. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.614 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.15 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Offers emotional support to another commenter without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Supportive message to another user; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is a supportive personal message to another user, offering to talk; it gives no opinion about the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a supportive personal message to another user, containing no mention or evaluation of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Supportive personal message with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers encouragement and support, but expresses no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Supportive message to another user about personal struggles; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a personal message of support, completely unrelated to the film. | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #40 w 0.156 I'm so sorry about your pupper. Hugs 🤍 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.383 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.21 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Offers sympathy about someone's dog without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Condolence to another commenter about their dog; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A sympathetic message about someone's dog; it gives no opinion on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses sympathy to another user about a pet and makes no mention of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Condolence about a dog, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers sympathy about the commenter’s dog but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Condolence about a pet ('pupper'), unrelated to the film; no judgement of the movie expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment expresses sympathy for a pet, unrelated to the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #41 w 0.154 That’s how you know it’s a good movie. As someone who’s been in the dark and honestly (still in the dark but at least I have a flashlight and have learned to navigate) that pain and emotion you feel are actually good things. The movie was just a way for you to expel that… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.991 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly calls it a good movie and praises its ability to evoke meaningful, cathartic emotions. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says the emotional impact is 'how you know it's a good movie', affirming the film's value. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says "that's how you know it's a good movie" because it evoked cathartic emotion; frames the film's emotional impact as valuable and good. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states it is a good movie that effectively evokes deep emotions. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly calls it a good movie for the emotion it evokes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly call it a good movie and praise its ability to evoke meaningful emotions. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.991 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Explicitly calls it a good movie and praises its emotional resonance. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #42 w 0.152 I'm not in the USA and it sounds like you are, but I think this is the equivalent of our Samaritans service. Please reach out and talk to someone confidentially, trauma and grief are real and you don't have to handle it alone. https://988lifeline.org/about/ VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.768 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Offers mental health support and a crisis resource without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Supportive reply sharing crisis resources with another user; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment offers a crisis support resource to another user and gives no opinion on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment provides mental health resources to another user without discussing or judging the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Supportive mental-health reply; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers compassionate support and crisis resources, but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Supportive crisis-resource message directed at a user; contains no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment provides a helpline link and support for trauma, offering no judgment of the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #43 w 0.151 Just when you think everything is fine they throw in the swamp of sadness. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.273 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.71 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes an unexpected sad turn without expressing approval or criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking reference to a sad scene; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Refers to a sad scene (a Neverending Story-style 'swamp of sadness' reference) without clearly judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/reference about a plot point without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes a sad plot turn without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — It reacts to a sad plot element but does not clearly judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a sad plot moment figuratively without any clear judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot reference without expressing a clear like or dislike of the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #44 w 0.149 I got some Lord of the Rings vibes from this film, that part reminded me of the Dead Marshes. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.22 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Compares a scene to the Dead Marshes without expressing approval or criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Only compares a scene to Lord of the Rings' Dead Marshes; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment notes a resemblance to Lord of the Rings (Dead Marshes) without expressing any judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Compares a scene to another movie without expressing whether they liked or disliked this film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene comparison to LOTR without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter notes a resemblance to Lord of the Rings without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comparison to Lord of the Rings' Dead Marshes is a observation without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only makes a comparison to another movie without judging this film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 Same. The woods in general. Some of the music. And JK Simmons character reminded me of Tom Bombadil. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.389 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.07 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.74 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Notes setting, music, and a character resemblance without expressing a judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Agrees with another commenter and lists comparisons (woods, music, Tom Bombadil) without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mentions liking some elements (woods, music) and a character comparison, but gives no clear overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes neutral observations and comparisons about the film's elements without expressing an overall opinion or verdict. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees and notes elements; no clear overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions the woods, music, and a character resemblance without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Lists things that reminded them of other works (woods, music, a Tom Bombadil comparison) without stating whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses specific elements like woods, music, and a character without giving a film verdict. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 Some people just shouldn't watch movies. It's clear some of you guys have lost the point "counting how many of the same shot set ups" or "cgi wolves and Bears" etc etc etc. The point of a movie of a story is to lose yourself in said story, yeah the flashbacks weren't Steve… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.718 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the movie overall, praising its emotional bond between man and dog despite minor criticisms. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they loved the movie overall and defends it from critics, despite minor complaints about the opening shot. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter states "I loved the movie overall," praises Odin and the emotional core, with only minor gripes and acknowledging it's not groundbreaking. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie overall despite acknowledging some minor flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the movie overall; flaws and non-Oscar status don't outweigh praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the movie overall and appreciated its story and emotional focus, despite one disliked shot and acknowledging it is not genre-defining. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says 'I loved the movie overall' and praises the dog and story, despite a minor complaint. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states "I loved the movie overall" despite minor criticisms. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #47 w 0.144 A lot of people don't know how to watch movies VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Criticizes other viewers without expressing a clear judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes other viewers, not the film; no explicit judgment of the movie itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Vague remark about viewers in general; doesn't state whether they liked the film or would recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment criticizes other viewers without stating an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Critiques other viewers, no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on how people watch movies without stating an opinion of this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Generic remark about audiences; no judgement of this film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment makes a general remark about viewers without judging the film itself. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #48 w 0.143 Thought this was a lot better than I expected, and by the end of it I found myself really emotional. I saw it in Dolby so maybe it skews my enjoyment of it but it was pretty brutal / tense at points, especially Pitt’s character being thrown against the rocks downstream. His arm… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.982 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Exceeded expectations, moved them emotionally, and earned praise for its tension, cinematography, performances, and Ayer’s return to form. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Better than expected, emotional, praises brutal tension, stunning cinematography, Pitt and Simmons; calls it a return to form. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says it was better than expected, emotional, with stunning cinematography, great performances, and a 'welcome return to form' for the director. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praised the performances, cinematography, tension, and emotional impact, calling it better than expected and a return to form. Grok 4.7: positive — Better than expected, emotional, stunning visuals, great performances, return to form. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed it, became emotional, praised its cinematography and performances, and called it a welcome return to form. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says it was much better than expected, emotional, stunning cinematography, great performances, and calls it a welcome return to form. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states it was much better than expected, emotional, and praises the cinematography and performances. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #49 w 0.141 Worthy of 4K bluray and place in my shelf easily. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.649 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Says the film deserves a 4K Blu-ray and a place in their personal collection. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter wants to own it on 4K Blu-ray, a clear endorsement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says it's worthy of a 4K Blu-ray and a place on their shelf, implying strong approval and recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter loved the movie enough to want to buy a physical 4K Blu-ray copy for their collection. Grok 4.7: positive — Says the film deserves a 4K purchase and shelf space. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say the film is worth owning on 4K Blu-ray, indicating strong approval. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says it's worthy of a 4K Blu-ray and deserves a place on their shelf, a clear endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter wants to buy the physical 4K bluray for their shelf, indicating they liked it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #51 w 0.139 THIS movie should have been called The Dog Stars. Odin genuinely outacted Brad in this. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Says the dog outacted Brad, implicitly criticizing the lead performance and suggesting the dog was the film’s highlight. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking title pun and quip about the dog outacting Brad; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the dog's performance as outacting the lead and suggests it deserved a better title, implying enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — A joke praising the dog's acting over Brad Pitt's without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about the dog outacting Brad; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They imply Brad was outacted, criticizing the film’s human performance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says a co-star outacted the lead, implying the film's lead performance disappointed; a critical comparison with no praise for the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the dog's performance over the human lead, implying a favorable view of the film. | 0 | + | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | − | − | + |
| thread #52 w 0.137 They were both very good here. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.493 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.71 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises both performers’ work in the film without expressing any criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the two performers' work, which signals approval of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the performances of two actors as 'very good', which expresses a favorable judgment of the film's acting. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the performances of two actors in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the performances in this film as very good. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises both performers in the film, expressing a positive reaction. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the performances as 'very good', a clear positive judgement of the film's acting. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the performances of both actors, indicating a positive view of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #53 w 0.136 They all 5 were excellent and Jk simmons cameo too VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.681 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Praises all five performers and J.K. Simmons’s cameo as excellent. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises all five performers as excellent and enjoyed the JK Simmons cameo. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the five main performances as excellent and also enjoyed the J.K. Simmons cameo, implying approval of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the actors and a cameo as 'excellent'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the five leads and Simmons cameo as excellent. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the cast and cameo, expressing a positive view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the performances as excellent and highlights the cameo, signaling approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the acting performance of all the cast members and the cameo. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #54 w 0.135 I put my hoodie on for the last twenty minutes so that everyone wouldn’t see that I was weeping. Walked out of the theater to find that everyone else was also crying. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.718 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.33 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes crying during the ending and others' reactions, without expressing whether they liked or recommend the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Describes being deeply moved to tears, along with the whole audience; an implied strong emotional endorsement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Describes being moved to tears by the ending and notes the whole audience was crying too, implying a strong emotional, favorable reaction. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter and the entire audience were deeply moved to tears by the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Deeply moved to tears; shared emotional impact implies the film landed powerfully. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter describes being deeply moved by the film, with no criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — The commenter wept through the film's ending and describes the emotional experience with warmth, implying a strong positive response. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Weeping and seeing everyone else cry indicates a deeply moving, powerful film experience. | − | 0 | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #55 w 0.134 Nahhhhh I feel like I'm in the twilight zone. This was the most predictable movie ever. Zero character development other than "oh yeah they're both ex-military" and then cue the violins and piano when he's bleeding out on a rock, like the director might as well just hold up a… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.503 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes predictable plotting, shallow characters, repetitive sentimentality, and heavy-handed emotional manipulation despite beautiful landscapes. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it predictable, manipulative, repetitive, lacking character development; brief praise of landscapes doesn't offset. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls it predictable, heavy-handed, with no character development and repetitive; only concedes beautiful landscapes. Overall clearly critical. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the film as predictable, heavy-handed, repetitive, and lacking character development despite beautiful landscapes. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls it predictable, undeveloped, and heavy-handed despite pretty landscapes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film as predictable, repetitive, and heavy-handed, despite praising the landscapes and initial character appeal. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.503 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the movie as predictable, repetitive, heavy-handed, and lacking character development despite beautiful landscapes. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #56 w 0.132 It always looked like it was going to be extremely by-the-numbers. I said it the other day, but this is a film for people who spend their time on Facebook, sharing AI generated videos of dogs. They were never going to do anything risky with this film, because you can't badmouth… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.153 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Dismisses the film as formulaic, risk-averse, and pandering to its target audience. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Dismisses film as predictable, risk-averse pandering to undiscerning audiences; clearly critical of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls the film by-the-numbers, risk-averse, and aimed at undiscerning audiences; clear criticism of the film itself, despite apparently not having seen it. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film as 'by-the-numbers', unoriginal, and unwilling to take any narrative risks. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film by-the-numbers, unrisky, and aimed at unsophisticated viewers. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film as predictable and unwilling to take risks. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.153 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film as by-the-numbers, risk-averse, and pandering to online audiences. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #57 w 0.131 I don't think you could be more correct about the audience. God, country, burgers type movie VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Characterizes the movie’s target audience and cultural appeal without clearly judging its quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the film's target audience without clearly stating personal like or dislike of it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment describes the target audience as 'God, country, burgers' type; implies a stereotype but doesn't clearly state a verdict on the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the movie's target demographic without stating whether they liked or disliked the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees about the audience type, no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the movie's presumed audience and style without judging whether the film is good or recommendable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the film's target audience with a quip, without clearly judging whether the commenter liked the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Dismissive description implies a negative view of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #58 w 0.13 Badmouth the military? Seriously? After watching this story, who in the world would sign up or want to be a part of that world? After what happened to that guy and that dog? The "military" that was depicted in this movie directly infers a miserable existence, a horror show.… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.767 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Argues the film portrays military life negatively, without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Argues about the film's portrayal of the military; gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Argues about the film's portrayal of the military in reply to another commenter, describing content without stating whether they liked the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Argues about the movie's portrayal of the military without stating whether they liked or disliked the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Debates the film's military portrayal; no like or recommend judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They criticize the film’s portrayal of the military, but express no opinion on whether the film itself is good. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.767 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter strongly criticizes the film's negative depiction of the military as a miserable horror show. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | − |
| thread #59 w 0.129 Re: the landscapes, if you look hard enough, you should see some overlap with LOTR backgrounds. Went on a LOTR tour in NZ a few months ago and at a couple of locations they noted they also recently wrapped filming this movie (which I had genuinely never heard of before) at… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.176 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Shares filming-location trivia and connections to LOTR without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares filming location trivia about LOTR overlap; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares trivia about filming locations overlapping with LOTR; offers no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only shares filming location trivia in New Zealand without expressing an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Filming-location trivia only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses filming locations and LOTR scenery overlap, without judging the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses filming locations and LOTR overlap; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses filming locations and LOTR trivia without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #60 w 0.128 Between this and Dog Stars, it has been a good month for films about dudes trying to survive in the American wilderness with a small plane and a loyal dog. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.718 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.85 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calling it a good month for films including this one conveys approval. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calling it part of 'a good month' for such films implies they enjoyed this one. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it part of 'a good month for films' alongside another, implying approval of this film, though casually and without detail. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Calling it a 'good month' for this specific subgenre implies the commenter enjoyed both films. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it part of a good month for similar films, implying approval. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling it a good month for films in this category expresses approval of this film alongside Dog Stars. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comparison of plot premises and a dry observation; no clear judgement of this film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses similar films and tropes without giving a verdict on this specific movie. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 I couldn't take the movie seriously once he suffered a massive heart attack & started swimming around grabbing his luggage. How would he even have the energy to get out of the plane? Guess those were some extra strength aspirin he was popping. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the film's implausibility, saying the heart attack aftermath made it impossible to take seriously. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says they couldn't take the movie seriously due to implausible plot, mocking it sarcastically. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes the plot's implausibility, saying they couldn't take the movie seriously because of the heart attack and swimming scene. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the movie's lack of realism, stating they couldn't take it seriously. Grok 4.7: negative — Couldn't take the film seriously due to an implausible scene. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They found a major scene implausible enough that they couldn't take the movie seriously. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter couldn't take the movie seriously and mocks its implausible scenes, signaling dislike of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter ridicules the plot's implausibility, indicating they did not like the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #62 w 0.126 He was using the aspirin as a blood thinner to relieve the clot that caused the heart attack, not as a pain reliever. Still you are right, a lot of movie allowances. Though that wasnt the point of the movie. The movie was about their bond. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.832 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Explains aspirin use and the film’s focus on their bond without expressing an overall judgment. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains aspirin plot point and notes movie allowances; defends intent without clearly judging film quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mostly explains a plot detail and concedes some movie allowances; states the film's focus without clearly judging whether it's good. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses plot mechanics and the movie's central theme without explicitly stating whether they liked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Explains plot and theme; notes realism allowances without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail and the movie’s focus on the characters’ bond, without judging whether the film is good. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses medical accuracy of a plot detail and the film's theme, with no clear judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details and character motivations without expressing a clear verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #63 w 0.125 It's a movie, he (with a broken arm and severe concussion) and his dog literally killed 4 wolves and incapacitated other but you complain about the heart attack not being realistic? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.66 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Challenges another viewer’s realism complaint using plot details, without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Rebuts another user's realism complaint without giving their own judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter defends the film's unrealism by pointing out other implausible events, but gives no overall verdict on whether they liked it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter argues with another user about the film's realism without expressing whether they liked the movie overall. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Defends a plot point's realism; no clear like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Points out an apparent realism inconsistency in the plot, but gives no clear opinion on whether the film is good or recommendable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter defends realism of a plot event by pushing back on a critic; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot realism and criticizes another user, without expressing a clear verdict on the film itself. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #64 w 0.124 If he’s going down to the plane anyway, why not grab the gun? I feel like if he has the gun he takes less damage in the wolf scene and lives More importantly, he was so careful with the planning but every time there was an avoidable obstacle he would push through it. If he’s… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.314 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions the character’s survival decisions and planning without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Questions character decisions and plot logic without giving an overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the protagonist's illogical decisions and plot holes (not grabbing the gun, avoidable obstacles), implying weak writing, though no explicit overall verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter questions a character's in-universe survival decisions without expressing an overall opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot-logic nitpicks about character choices, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Questions the character’s choices and planning, but does not judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot critique and questions about character decisions; no clear judgement of whether they liked the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the character's poor decision-making and the film's avoidable plot obstacles. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #65 w 0.123 The gun flew out on the initial crash when Odin got ripped out of it. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.625 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes a plot event without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains a plot detail about the gun during the crash; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot detail about a gun during the crash scene; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely describes a plot point or scene detail without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene detail only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a plot detail without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a plot detail about a crash scene with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion and detail observation without any judgement of the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #66 w 0.122 Neither the bridge or the swamp were on the map. The bridge it doesnt explain, but itd never be on a map. And he says a few more miles, and weve got a nice field to cross. When he gets there, he find sits a swamp instead of a field. His info was incorrect for whatever reason. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.572 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Explains plot details about the map and swamp without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion about map details; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details about the map, bridge, and swamp without giving any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion regarding details about a map and locations in the story, with no opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot detail discussion only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses discrepancies in the character’s map and directions without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion about map inconsistencies and a swamp; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only discussing plot details and geography without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #67 w 0.121 Open fields can be wetlands in early spring. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.22 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — The comment discusses seasonal landscape conditions without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Factual remark about fields and wetlands; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is an observation about open fields and wetlands, with no judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment states a geographical/seasonal fact and does not express any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia-like remark with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A factual observation about open fields, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A neutral observation about landscape with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot or trivia comment without a judgment of the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 Good film but how did a former green beret not have one $300 Garmin satellite device in either of those two massive trunks he had? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.238 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly calls it a good film, despite questioning a character's missing survival equipment. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a good film; the plot-hole nitpick is minor and doesn't outweigh the overall approval. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a good film; the plot-hole nitpick is minor and doesn't change the overall favorable lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states it is a 'Good film' despite pointing out a minor plot convenience. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a good film despite a realism nitpick. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a good film, while questioning one implausible detail. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it a 'Good film'; the rest is a nitpick about a plot detail, not a criticism of the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter starts by stating it is a 'Good film', followed by a minor plot criticism. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 Thank you. When he was digging through the crates, I kept asking myself "where the fuck is your radio to call for help?" This guy goes out to the middle of the wilderness with bottles of beer, bags of jerky, medical supplies galore, a map, a compass, an even a bottle of aspirin… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.788 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.14 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Criticizes the film’s implausible survival setup, questioning the absence of essential emergency communication equipment. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes plot logic: protagonist implausibly lacks any radio or emergency beacon despite ample supplies. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes the film's plot logic and plausibility, complaining the protagonist lacks any means to call for help despite being well-supplied. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter questions a plot hole regarding a character's supplies without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film’s illogical wilderness prep and missing emergency radio. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film’s implausible scenario, questioning why the character has no way to call for help. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Critiques the protagonist's lack of survival gear, a plot-logic question, without expressing an overall verdict on the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the protagonist's unrealistic lack of survival gear, highlighting a flaw in the film's logic. | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #70 w 0.119 He had the radio in the plane and he had no plans to go on any big hikes. He was merely camping on the beach. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Clarifies a character's circumstances and plans without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details about the character's situation without judging the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses plot details about the character's radio and camping plans, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot clarification only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Clarifies the character’s plans and circumstances without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot recap about a character's radio and camping plans; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot logic and character actions without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #71 w 0.118 I never thought Brad Pitt would do a dog movie. He's basically top of the top in Hollywood and can get any role he wants. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.382 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Comments on Brad Pitt’s stature and casting choice without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on Brad Pitt's role choice without judging the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on Brad Pitt's career choice and surprise at the role; offers no judgement of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses surprise at Brad Pitt's casting choice without judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Comments on casting choice, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on Brad Pitt's choice of role, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about Brad Pitt's career and a 'dog movie' without judging the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Brad Pitt's career choices and association with a dog movie without judging the film itself. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #72 w 0.117 Yeah but then all his kids said he's a piece of shit and he needed to get back some points. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.649 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses someone's behavior and motives without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character's motivations within the plot; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot/character discussion about a character's motivation; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about an actor or character's personal life without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot talk about a character, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the character and his children, without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot point about a character's family, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot points and character actions without expressing a judgment or recommendation about the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #73 w 0.116 His character towards the end of the movie: "I have no family" VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.19 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Quotes a character's dialogue without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Quotes a character's line without any judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Quotes a line about a character's arc near the end; no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is simply a quote or joke about a character's dialogue without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quotes a character line with no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a character's line without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only quotes a line of dialogue from the film with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only quotes a line from the film without expressing any opinion. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #74 w 0.115 I think the boat has shipped for that VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.30 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — An idiomatic remark without any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Vague idiomatic remark with no clear judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Vague remark that an opportunity has passed; gives no judgement of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a general remark without expressing any opinion or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Idiom about a missed chance; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A brief ambiguous remark with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Idiomatic remark about a plot or situation; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A vague idiom that does not express a clear opinion or verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #75 w 0.115 He has had bad character press recently. This movie is a safe way to get him associated with warm and cuddly family vibes VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.077 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses the movie as image rehabilitation for an actor, without judging its quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the actor's image and casting strategy, with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the actor's publicity and the movie's image-rehabilitation function; offers no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Speculation about an actor's PR strategy without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — PR comment about an actor's image, not a film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the movie's image and branding, not whether the commenter liked it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses the actor's public image and marketing strategy, not a judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses marketing and public perception rather than judging the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #76 w 0.114 I want to take my wife to see this, but I need confirmation that the dog is safe before I can confidently make the pitch to her VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.846 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film; asks whether the dog is safe before deciding to take their wife. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; asks whether the dog survives before taking wife. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they're asking whether the dog survives before planning to watch it, so there's no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film yet and is asking about plot details. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen it; only asks if the dog survives. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They ask whether the dog is safe but give no opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter intends to take their wife to see the film and wants to make a pitch for it, indicating interest and recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film and is asking about the plot. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #77 w 0.113 The very first scene is a flashforward showing the dog has survived and is safe now. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.735 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.18 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Describes the opening scene and the dog's survival without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Factual note about the opening scene, likely reassurance for viewers; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the opening scene's plot detail without expressing any judgement or recommendation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a plot detail without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot observation about a flashforward; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — This is a plot observation, not an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a plot detail (opening flashforward) without any judgement of the film's quality or whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot detail without expressing a judgement of the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #78 w 0.113 The dog is safe but it will fuck you up still VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.586 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.33 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Warns about emotional impact and confirms the dog's safety without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Spoiler-style reassurance and emotional warning about the dog; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Warns the dog survives but the film is emotionally devastating; describes impact without clearly stating whether they liked it or recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Describes the film as emotionally devastating, which in movie discussion context indicates effective impact rather than criticism. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about the dog, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — It warns the film is emotionally intense but does not say whether the commenter liked or recommends it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a vague, cryptic remark about a dog being safe; it gives no clear judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the emotional impact of the film despite its intensity. | − | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #79 w 0.112 The dog is fine in the end but oh man its very sad. They knew what they were doing with the last 15 minutes and the music. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.636 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Credits the ending and music with deliberately delivering a powerful emotional impact. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the emotionally effective ending and music; the sadness is framed as skillful filmmaking. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the emotional impact of the last 15 minutes and music as deliberate and effective; sadness treated as an achievement, not a flaw. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the emotional effectiveness and craftsmanship of the ending and music. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the intentional, effective ending and music despite sadness. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the final 15 minutes and music as emotionally effective; the sadness describes the film’s impact, not a criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film's emotional impact, the ending, and the music as effective, implying a favorable view despite the sadness. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Acknowledges emotional impact and effectiveness of the filmmaking ('They knew what they were doing'). | − | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #80 w 0.111 I liked it okay and I did cry a little at the end, but no mascara was damaged in the watching of the movie. Here’s my issue…I do not believe Oden would have ever left James. Yes, James told him to find the road and we dog lovers want to believe Oden understood the assignment. I… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.893 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Says they liked it okay and were emotionally moved, despite criticizing the plausibility of Oden leaving James. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Liked it okay and praised the dogs, but found the dog leaving implausible and was only mildly moved. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says they liked it 'okay' and cried a little, but raises a significant plausibility complaint about the dog leaving James; no strong overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Says 'I liked it okay' and praised the dog, but had a major issue with the plot's believability. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked it okay, cried a little, praised the dogs despite a plot quibble. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They liked it somewhat and were moved by the ending, but criticized the central dog behavior as unbelievable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.893 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Liked it and cried, but had issues with the plot logic regarding the dog. | + | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #81 w 0.11 I agree. Odin would not have left James' body. Even though the movie played out that way, it still appeared that Odin hung around a few days before finally leaving. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.599 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses Odin's behavior and plot events without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail about Odin's behavior without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and character logic about Odin and James without expressing any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot point and character behavior without expressing an overall opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot discussion of character behavior, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail about Odin and James, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot logic about Odin's behavior and a story detail without expressing any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and character behavior without expressing a verdict on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #82 w 0.11 Yeah, that makes me feel like Odin only stayed until he knew James was gone. I don’t think he’d have left his side otherwise. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.572 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.55 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Interprets Odin’s motives and loyalty without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets the plot and a character's motives without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Speculates about a character's motivation (Odin and James) in the plot; offers no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot and character actions without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about characters, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Interprets a character’s actions without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a plot point and Odin's motivation; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot points and character motivations without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #83 w 0.109 Hey yall -this is my first Reddit comment so hi! I loved the movie and I am actually a GSD owner named James . I work at a German shepherd rescue and they were all worried about the influx of people adopting after the movie and then returning to shelters. I was like -that is… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.991 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the movie and praised its ending, nature scenes, action, and Oden as excellent. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they loved the movie; praises nature scenes, action, the dog as excellent; appreciated the death scene. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says they loved the movie and praises the death scene, nature scenes, action, and the dog Oden as excellent. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie and calls its elements excellent. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved the movie and called scenes, action, and Oden excellent. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly loved the movie and praise its nature scenes, action, and dog. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they loved the movie and praises the nature scenes, action, and everything as excellent. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I loved the movie' and praises the nature scenes and action. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #84 w 0.108 Makes me want to get a German shepherd. Solid movie VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.226 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calling it a "solid movie" clearly expresses approval. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a 'solid movie' and says it inspired them to get a German shepherd, a clear approving verdict. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a 'solid movie' and says it inspires them to get a German shepherd, indicating a favorable view. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter directly praises the film by calling it a 'solid movie'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a solid movie; wants a German shepherd. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a solid movie, indicating a positive opinion. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls it a 'Solid movie' and says it makes them want a German shepherd, a clear endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it a 'solid movie' and expresses a positive sentiment. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #85 w 0.108 The daddyest of dad movies my god. but it’s actually quite good! really solid direction from Ayer especially during the more intense sequences (though the occasional CGI is abysmal), and an incredibly reliable badass Brad Pitt performance. Star of the show is obviously Odin,… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.991 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it quite good, praising direction, performances, sound design, and score despite occasional poor CGI. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it quite good, praising direction, Pitt, the dog, the sound and the score; the CGI complaint is minor. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says it's 'actually quite good', praising direction, Pitt, the dog, sound and score; only minor CGI complaint. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states the movie is "quite good" and praises the direction, acting, sound design, and score. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film quite good and praises direction, performances, sound, and score despite bad CGI. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film quite good and praises its direction, performances, sound design, and score despite occasional bad CGI. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.991 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states the movie is quite good, praising direction, performances, and technical elements. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Sorry, but from the beginning I thought ,'He supposed to be Green Beret and he keeps making bad choices ?'. Like flying into a storm instead of staying put until it has passed, trying to get across a raging waterway instead of turning back and going a different way. I couldn't… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.926 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Implausible character decisions prevented them from appreciating the film, despite recognizing its focus on the relationship. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the protagonist's implausible bad choices and says they couldn't really appreciate the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes protagonist's foolish choices as unrealistic, says they couldn't appreciate the film despite recognizing its relationship focus. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter states they couldn't appreciate the film due to the main character's illogical and foolish decisions. Grok 4.7: negative — Couldn't appreciate the film due to foolish character choices. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They couldn't appreciate the film because the protagonist's repeated foolish choices distracted them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.926 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the protagonist's foolish choices and states they 'couldn't really appreciate it'. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #87 w 0.107 I seriously don’t understand the praise for this movie. Saw it Monday and thought it was average at best. Predictable from start to finish, doesn’t add anything new to the survival genre, weirdly slow-paced for most of the runtime, and Brad Pitt didn’t even pretend to act. The… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.316 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol: negative — Calls the film predictable, slow-paced, poorly acted, and laughable, explicitly rejecting its praise. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it average at best, predictable, slow, poorly acted, with a laughable ending and cheap flashbacks. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter calls the film average at best, predictable, slow, poorly acted, with laughable ending and flashbacks; says they don't understand the praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the acting, pacing, predictability, and ending, concluding that it is average at best. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls it average at best, predictable, poorly acted, and laughable. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls it average at best and criticizes its predictability, pacing, acting, ending, and flashbacks. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.316 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the movie average at best, predictable, slow-paced, and poorly acted, with a laughable ending. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #88 w 0.106 My god, do you throw bread down from your ivory tower for the small country people? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Sarcastic remark directed at another person, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Sarcastic jab at another commenter; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Sarcastic jab at another commenter; gives no opinion on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is an insult directed at another user or person, with no mention or judgment of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Sarcastic jab at another commenter, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted or rhetorical line with no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Sarcastic jab at the commenter's critic, implying the film's defender is condescending; no clear praise of the film itself, but the tone dismisses a positive take. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a quote or joke and does not express a judgment about the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 |
| thread #89 w 0.105 What was the point of the Pelican cases being filled with water? If for no other reason than to watch Brad struggle bring them back up on land. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.542 siebert+opinion (LIVE): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Questions a plot detail and jokes about Brad's struggle without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a plot question about the water-filled cases; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a plot-related question about the Pelican cases with a light joke; no clear judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks a question about a specific plot point/detail without offering an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Questions one plot detail; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The sarcastic question implies the water-filled cases were a pointless plot contrivance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a plot detail and speculates on a scene's purpose; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is asking a plot question without expressing an opinion on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #90 w 0.105 Right? Pelicans are supposed to be waterproof! He spilled out all the water but somehow the contents were still dry. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Discusses a scene's logic without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking nitpick about a scene's logic, no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment jokes about a plot detail (pelican and dry contents) without giving an overall judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a minor plot detail or goof without giving an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot nitpick about a scene detail, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A humorous observation about a scene’s implausibility, without a clear verdict on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a plot detail (pelican waterproofing) without judging the film's quality or whether they recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot continuity error without expressing an opinion on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #91 w 0.104 Contents were in water proof bags. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.45 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — Clarifies a plot detail without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot detail about waterproof bags; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A plot detail about contents being in waterproof bags; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a minor plot detail without expressing any opinion or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Factual remark with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A factual statement about contents, with no opinion or recommendation about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a factual remark about contents being in waterproof bags; no judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details without expressing any opinion on the film. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #92 w 0.104 I enjoyed the movie. I wrote my graduate capstone on the human–animal bond, so I found the movie interesting thru that lens. My research focused on how relationships between humans and animals can involve attachment, mutual dependence, emotional regulation, trauma, and grief. I… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.97 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.15 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.78 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly enjoyed the movie and appreciated its deeper exploration of human–animal bonds, trauma, attachment, and grief. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — States they enjoyed the movie and found its exploration of the human-animal bond deep and interesting. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Opens with 'I enjoyed the movie' and goes on to praise its depth in exploring the human–animal bond. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the movie and praises its deep exploration of the human-animal bond. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly enjoyed the film and valued its deeper themes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they enjoyed the movie and praise its exploration of the human–animal bond. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says 'I enjoyed the movie' and finds it deeply meaningful through their academic lens; clear praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I enjoyed the movie' and provides favorable academic analysis. | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #93 w 0.103 That cosmic aurora scene at the end with it reflecting in Odin’s eyes was beautiful . Great movie . VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.84 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the ending scene beautiful and explicitly says it was a great movie. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the final aurora scene as beautiful and calls it a great movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the ending aurora scene as beautiful and explicitly states 'Great movie.' Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises a specific scene as beautiful and calls it a "Great movie." Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the ending scene and calls it a great movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the scene beautiful and explicitly says it was a great movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises a specific scene as beautiful and explicitly calls the movie great. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter called it a 'great movie' and praised a specific scene. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #94 w 0.103 Only thing I have to add is that I cried, along with the rest of my row seemingly, for the last 20 minutes. Last movie to move me this much upon first watch was Aftersun. What a wonderful song cover to open the credits with, made me want to cry in the car ride home. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.612 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Strong emotional impact, favorable comparison to Aftersun, and praise for the credits song indicate appreciation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Deeply moved, compares favorably to Aftersun, praises the credits song; crying signals strong appreciation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was deeply moved, cried through the final 20 minutes, compared it to Aftersun, and called the credits song wonderful. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter was deeply moved to tears and praised the wonderful credits song. Grok 4.7: positive — Deeply moved, cried, and praised the ending and song cover. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They were deeply moved by the film and praise its closing song cover. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter cried through the last 20 minutes, compares it to Aftersun, and praises the opening credits song—clear enthusiasm for the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter was deeply moved, cried, and compared it favorably to another acclaimed film, indicating high praise. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #95 w 0.102 Loved it hit me in the feels. I interpreted it was Brad was saying to Odin what a loyal loving dog wants to say to his master when he dies, or at least what my dog said to me when he went. I got you, I’ll be waiting for you, go live your life VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.898 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Explicitly loved the film and found it emotionally moving, connecting its message to their own dog. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says 'Loved it', found it emotionally moving, and shares a personal interpretation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Explicitly says they loved it and that it emotionally moved them, sharing a touching personal interpretation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and that it emotionally resonated with them. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved it and was emotionally moved. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly loved the film and say it moved them emotionally. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved it and it hit them emotionally, offering a heartfelt interpretation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly stated they 'loved it' and connected emotionally with the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #96 w 0.102 He probably died from exhaustion writing that long note to put in the dog. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.727 siebert+opinion (LIVE): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol: no_verdict — A joke about a plot detail, with no clear judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about a plot detail; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about a plot detail (the long note placed in the dog); it gives no clear judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a plot detail without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a plot detail, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about a character's actions, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a joke about a plot detail (a long note in the dog), with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about the plot, no judgment of the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #97 w 0.101 Solid survival movie, and damn if there wasnt a dry eye in my theater at the end. The letter he wrote broke me. The dog Odin deserves nothing but peace after such a turbulent life 😭 VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.885 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls it a solid survival movie and praises its emotionally affecting ending. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a solid survival movie; emotional praise of the ending moving the whole theater. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a solid survival movie and describes it as deeply moving, with tears in the theater and emotional praise. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls it a 'solid survival movie' and praises its strong emotional impact. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a solid survival movie and praises its emotional ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a solid survival movie and praises its emotionally powerful ending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it a solid survival movie and describes being emotionally moved; clear endorsement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Describes it as a solid survival movie with a deeply emotional and impactful ending. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #98 w 0.101 Above average film for me - the setting was awesome and Odin was a star VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Calls the film above average and praises the setting and Odin. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it above average, praises the setting and Odin's performance; overall favorable. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it an above average film, praising the awesome setting and Odin as a star. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly rates the film as 'above average' and praises the setting and performance. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film above average and praises setting and Odin. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it above average and praises the setting and Odin. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls it 'above average' and praises the setting and lead performance, a clear lean toward liking it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it an "above average film" and praises the setting and animal star. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #99 w 0.1 I can see why some people don't like this movie. Its not character driven and the plot isn't new. But as someone who has an older dog who looks and acts exactly as Odin did in this movie, the "please cry now" sign that the movie put up hit me like a truck. I wasnt crying for… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.111 siebert+opinion (LIVE): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol: positive — Despite acknowledging flaws, they praise the poetic bond and describe the film’s emotional impact as deeply relatable. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Acknowledges flaws but was deeply moved by the dog bond, praising it as poetic; leans positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Acknowledges flaws but was deeply moved by the dog bond and poetic description; emotional impact and affection lean clearly positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Acknowledges flaws in plot and character, but overall strongly moved and praised the poetic portrayal of the dog-owner bond. Grok 4.7: positive — Acknowledges flaws but was deeply moved and loved the bond. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite noting familiar plotting and limited character focus, they were deeply moved by the film’s portrayal of the bond and praise its writing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter acknowledges others' dislike but personally loved the film, finding it emotionally powerful and poetic. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter admits flaws but connects deeply with the emotional core, resulting in a personal endorsement. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |